2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-4257(03)00016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroethology and life history adaptations of the elasmobranch electric sense

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Females exhibit an increased abundance of electrosensory nerve axons, resulting in a possible increase in their electrosensitivity, which will likely improve the signal-to-noise ratio, allowing females to differentiate between approaching conspecifics and potential predators. If we consider the fact that it is only the males that make the approach to waiting females for reproduction [Sisneros and Tricas, 2002], then males may not require the ability to differentiate between approaching females and predators, so any detection of an approaching stimulus could be interpreted as dangerous (predator). On the contrary, females need to be able to identify a conspecific signal over a predatory signal to facilitate mating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Females exhibit an increased abundance of electrosensory nerve axons, resulting in a possible increase in their electrosensitivity, which will likely improve the signal-to-noise ratio, allowing females to differentiate between approaching conspecifics and potential predators. If we consider the fact that it is only the males that make the approach to waiting females for reproduction [Sisneros and Tricas, 2002], then males may not require the ability to differentiate between approaching females and predators, so any detection of an approaching stimulus could be interpreted as dangerous (predator). On the contrary, females need to be able to identify a conspecific signal over a predatory signal to facilitate mating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crooks and Waring [2013], however, noted sexual dimorphism in the morphology of the ampulla receptors of S. canicula , suggesting there may be behavioural differences between the sexes, specifically in the way they use the system to locate conspecifics. In addition, the use of electroreception for mate location has previously been observed in other elasmobranch species [Bratton and Ayers, 1987;Tricas et al, 1995, Sisneros andTricas, 2002]. For example, female round stingrays (Urolophus halleri) were shown to rest on the substrate, whilst males swam in search of them, using electroreception to detect conspecifics [Sisneros and Tricas, 2002].…”
Section: Sexual Dimorphism Of the Electrosensory Systemmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Bratton and Ayers (1987) recorded an increase in the number of times individuals discharge their organs when in contact with conspecifics. In addition, the peak discharge frequency detectable by skates adjusts at the onset of maturity to match the peak frequency of EODs generated by conspecifics (New 1990;Sisneros et al 1998;Sisneros and Tricas 2002) and reproductively active skates discharge their organs at similar peak frequencies to those detectable by other skates (Sisneros and Tricas 2002). Although this evidence is suggestive of a communicative role for skate electric organs, studies identifying sexual and ontogenetic dimorphisms in the skate EOD are needed to identify its role, if any, in gender-specific or readiness-tomate signaling during courtship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%