Neuroenhancing Substances Use, Exam Anxiety and Academic Performance in Bosnian-Herzegovinian Firstyear University Students

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the use of neuroenhancing substances, exam anxiety and academic performance among first-year Bosnian-Herzegovinian (BH) university students. Methods. In a cross-sectional study, an ad hoc questionnaire was delivered to a sample of BH first-year university students. The following data were collected: socio-demographic features, consumption of neuroenchancing substances, the Westside Test Anxiety Scale (WTAS) and academic performance. Results. A total of 214 students were included. Consumption of lifestyle substances, coffee, energy drinks, nicotine, alcohol, and marijuana, for the purpose of neuroenhancement increased during the week before the exams. OTC cognitive enhancer use was reported by 31.0%, and of benzodiazepines by 1.5% of students. No psycostimulants were used. A high to extremely high exam WTAS score was reported in 38.3% students. The exam WTAS score was positively correlated with consumption of coffee (rho=0.31; P<0.001), energy drinks (rho=0.18; P=0.009), and nicotine (rho=0.22; P=0.001), and negatively correlated with last exam grade (rho=-0.33; P<0.001). The exam WTAS score was a significant independent predictor (OR=0.55; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97, P=0.039) for self-assessed academic performance. Self-assessed academic performance was positively correlated with last exam grade (rho=0.15; P=0.043). Conclusions. Although first-year BH university students do not seem to use either prescription or illicit psycostimulants, the consumption of nicotine, alcohol, and marijuana is worrying. However, the consumption of these neuroenhancing substances seems not to be related to better self-assessed academic performance. Finally, exam anxiety seems to be a significant problem among BH first-year university students.

Stress and behavioral changes with remote E-exams during the Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study among undergraduates of medical sciences

“…A study at Universities in Trnava reported better mood, more concentration, increased physical activity and hyperactivity in respondents after the energy drinks consumption, while sleep suppression was reported by the majority [ 42 ]. However, consumption of coffee and energy drinks, for the purpose of neuroenhancement was found to be increased during the week before the exams among Bosnian-Herzegovinian university students and was correlated with exam stress level [ 43 ].…”

Prevalence and Socio-Demographic, Academic, Health and Lifestyle Predictors of Illicit Drug/s Use among University Undergraduate Students in Finland

“…For instance, some studies separate marijuana or cannabis use from each other IDU [ 65 , 69 ]. Others refer to a mesh of terms e.g., neuroenhancing substances (could include coffee, energy drinks, nicotine, alcohol) or psycostimulants [ 70 ]; illicit stimulants (amphetamines, Fenethylline, Ritalin, Concerta, Dexedrine, Adderall, Vyvanse) [ 71 ]; nonmedical attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication [ 72 ]; illicit substances (including cocaine, designer drugs, and nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and opioids) [ 73 ]; illicit drug use, and misuse of prescription stimulants, sedatives, and opioids [ 74 ]; hallucinogen use [ 75 ]; smart drugs (aka cognitive enhancers, prescription drugs taken, either without a prescription or at a dose exceeding that which is prescribed) [ 76 , 77 ]; street drugs vs. prescription drugs [ 78 ]; or nonmedical use of prescription stimulants [ 79 ].…”

The Impact of COVID‐19 Lockdown on Design Students’ Performance Case Study in the UAE

“…Pekrun et al (2011) showed that students' motivation, control, use of learning strategies, value appraisals, academic performance and self-regulation of learning are directly linked and connected to their emotions regarding their achievements (Pekrun et al 2011). Significant negative emotions, such as shame, anger and anxiety, have very negative effects on their performance, as expected (Hancock 2001;Kusturica et al 2019;Pekrun et al 2011). In addition, the educational engagement and effective learning in general are directly affected by the disadvantages of long-term distancing and isolation (Carlson 2020).…”