2010
DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2010.00112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroengineering tools/applications for bidirectional interfaces, brain–computer interfaces, and neuroprosthetic implants – a review of recent progress

Abstract: The main focus of this review is to provide a holistic amalgamated overview of the most recent human in vivo techniques for implementing brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), bidirectional interfaces, and neuroprosthetics. Neuroengineering is providing new methods for tackling current difficulties; however neuroprosthetics have been studied for decades. Recent progresses are permitting the design of better systems with higher accuracies, repeatability, and system robustness. Bidirectional interfaces integrate reco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(256 reference statements)
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a variety of situations in which such devices can be of use with proposed applications in the fields of gerontology, rehabilitative medicine, psychiatry, neurology and clinical research [1]. More specifically, neural interface systems (NIS) can be used for communication [2], to restore lost functional movement [3], to reinnervate target locations for bladder control and for the treatment of neurological conditions like epilepsy [4, 5] and Parkinson’s Disease [6] among others.…”
Section: 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of situations in which such devices can be of use with proposed applications in the fields of gerontology, rehabilitative medicine, psychiatry, neurology and clinical research [1]. More specifically, neural interface systems (NIS) can be used for communication [2], to restore lost functional movement [3], to reinnervate target locations for bladder control and for the treatment of neurological conditions like epilepsy [4, 5] and Parkinson’s Disease [6] among others.…”
Section: 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain computer interfaces are becoming increasingly sophisticated and primates have been trained to feed themselves with mechanical appendages wired into the motor cortex of the brain (Yang et al, 2005;Rothschild, 2010;Nicolas-Alonso and Gomez-Gil, 2012;Pasqualotto et al, 2012). In addition, a number of devices can transduce visual data into sound (echolocation), electrotactile stimulation of the skin, or electrical stimulation of the tongue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the approximate location of neurons functionally ascribed to Area 5d in previous studies (Bremner and Andersen, 2012, Cui and Andersen, 2011). The Cereport (formerly known as the “Utah” array) has been commonly used in human neuroprosthetic studies and was thus used in the present study to more closely mimic clinical techniques for recording extracellular potentials (Rothschild 2010). Neural activity was amplified, digitized, and recorded with the Cerebus neural signal processor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%