2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(200002)11:2<141::aid-jmri10>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: Spectrum of appearances on MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
73
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by Owen et al [34] , 14 out of 29 (48.3%) lesions demonstrated this finding, while only one out of 29 (3.4%) showed a reversal of signal, that is, T1 hyperintensity and T2 hypointensity. The study by Semelka et al [35] showed a positive predictive value of 96% for MRI in pancreatic NETs. Gastrinomas tend to show ring or peripheral enhancement while most other subtypes of NETs demonstrated a diffuse pattern of enhancement.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Owen et al [34] , 14 out of 29 (48.3%) lesions demonstrated this finding, while only one out of 29 (3.4%) showed a reversal of signal, that is, T1 hyperintensity and T2 hypointensity. The study by Semelka et al [35] showed a positive predictive value of 96% for MRI in pancreatic NETs. Gastrinomas tend to show ring or peripheral enhancement while most other subtypes of NETs demonstrated a diffuse pattern of enhancement.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the mid 1990s, two-phase dynamic incremental CT was considered standard, with a reported sensitivity ranging from 64-82% [10,11]. The role of MRI, however, has quickly gained recognition as an equivalent, if not superior, modality for diagnosing pancreatic tumors, with a reported sensitivity of 75-100% [11,12]. There is also a suggestion that MRI may be superior in imaging tumors less than 2.5 cm in diameter [12] with one retrospective study finding tumors as small as 1 cm in diameter [12].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The syndrome, also named WDHA (Watery Diarrhoea, Hypokalaemia, Achlorhydria), is caused by the excessive production of the Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) which stimulates fluid and electrolyte secretion in the intestinal epithelium through the activation of cyclic adenosine mono-phosphate pathway [3] . As most endocrine pancreatic tumors appear as hypervascular nodular lesions at either contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR), cross-sectional imaging findings of pancreatic vipomas are usually not specific [4][5][6][7] . However, the role of both CT and/or MR is pivotal to localize the lesion and evaluate its size and anatomic relationships in view of a surgical approach which represents the standard of care [8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Unenhanced MR showed a definite oval mass, hypointense in T1-FFE sequences (Figure 2A) and mildly hyper-intense in the HASTE-T2-weighted sequences ( Figure 2B), at the level of the pancreatic tail (Figure 2). Although these signal intensities are commonly observed in pancreatic endocrine tumors, they are not specific [6,7] . Some endocrine tumors may indeed characteristically exhibit a low signal intensity on T2-weighted sequence as a result of their collagen content [4] , but this was not the Immunohisto-chemical analysis showed intense and uniform staining with Chromogranin-A ( Figure 4A) with less than 2% of cells positive with Ki-67 ( Figure 4B) as usually observed in well-differentiated neuro-endocrine tumors, currently classified as well-differentiated vipoma (NET G1) [19] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%