Allostatic load (AL) is a complex clinical construct, providing a unique
window into the cumulative impact of stress. However, due to its inherent
complexity, AL presents two major measurement challenges to conventional
statistical modeling (the field’s dominant methodology): it is comprised
of a complex causal network of bioallostatic systems, represented by an even
larger set of dynamic biomarkers; and, it is situated within a web of antecedent
socioecological systems, linking AL to differences in health outcomes and
disparities. To address these challenges, we employed case-based computational
modeling (CBM), which allowed us to make four advances: (1) we developed a
multisystem, 7-factor (20 biomarker) model of AL’s network of allostatic
systems; (2) used it to create a catalog of nine different clinical AL profiles
(causal pathways); (3) linked each clinical profile to a typology of 23 health
outcomes; and (4) explored our results (post hoc) as a function of gender, a key
socioecological factor. In terms of highlights, (a) the Healthy clinical profile
had few health risks; (b) the pro-inflammatory profile linked to high blood
pressure and diabetes; (c) Low Stress Hormones linked to heart disease,
TIA/Stroke, diabetes, and circulation problems; and (d) high stress hormones
linked to heart disease and high blood pressure. Post hoc analyses also found
that males were overrepresented on the High Blood Pressure (61.2%),
Metabolic Syndrome (63.2%), High Stress Hormones (66.4%), and
High Blood Sugar (57.1%); while females were overrepresented on the
Healthy (81.9%), Low Stress Hormones (66.3%), and Low Stress
Antagonists (stress buffers) (95.4%) profiles.