Neuroeconomics: New Heart for Economics or New Face of Economic Imperialism

Koshovets, Olga B.; Тарас, Вархотов

doi:10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.1.006-019

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Библиографический обзор показал, что в целом в экономической литературе встречаются разные типы экономик, изучением которых занимались представители различных направлений экономической науки: инновационная экономика [Shiliga et al, 2020], информационная экономика , экономика знаний [Powell et al, 2004;, цифровая экономика [About Readiness ... , 2017;Amuso et al, 2019], креативная экономика [Kačerauskas, 2015;, нейроэкономика [Koshovets et al, 2019], сетевая экономика [Шумахов и др., 2020], теневая экономика [Shadow Economy ... , 2020;The Shadow Economy ... , 2020], зеленая экономика [Toxambayeva, 2017;, циркулярная экономика [Stahel, 2016; и др.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Outlines of the Species Diversity of the Human-Oriented Economy

Nasyrova¹

2022

Vestn. Volgogr. gos. univ. Econom.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The need for the development of the economy and its constant modernization in accordance with the demands of the external and internal environment require the construction of a new type of economy that actualizes the key role of human in it. The experience of socio-economic transformations in various countries shows that inattention to a human, his absence as a core-forming element in the economic system contributes to crises and recessions. Accordingly, there is a change of priorities towards a human-oriented economy. The purpose of the study is to develop a typology of the species diversity of a human-oriented economy. The methodological basis of the study was the systemic and categorical-systemic approaches. Methods were applied: content analysis, “Range of information criteria”. The following results of the study were obtained: 1) the variety of types of economic systems is indicated; 2) a typology of the species diversity of a human-oriented economy has been developed on the basis of its fundamental spheres that ensure the satisfaction of human needs, based on its threefold nature; 3) thirty-six types of humancentered economy are identified on the basis of combinations of its core-forming spheres; 4) possible directions of the development of a human-oriented economy are substantiated by identifying its type and determining the vector of “movement” along the trajectory of the species diversity; 5) the possibility of building management mechanisms by determining the current type of human-oriented economy and the image of its desired future is argued; 6) it is substantiated that the typology of the species diversity of a human-oriented economy is the basis for the development of preventive measures to prevent the regressive development. The practical and theoretical value of the conducted research is the possibility of further research to identify the level of development of the human-oriented economy and develop the directions of management decisions on this basis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionunclassified

Outlines of the Species Diversity of the Human-Oriented Economy

Nasyrova¹

2022

Vestn. Volgogr. gos. univ. Econom.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Naturalizing the Subject of Economics: From Following the Norms of Natural Science to Owning the Laws of Nature

2020

Logos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the central threads in the historical development of economic science since the 18th century is the search for ways to turn the economy into a discipline resembling natural science, to put it on a solid empirical foundation expressed in mathematical language completely devoid of subjectivity while it apprehends the laws of nature. The article reviews the epistemological history of economics as a discipline through confrontations between epistemic virtues (“moral certainty” and “mechanical objectivity”), research strategies (empiricism and mathematical rationality) and institutional status (science or art). In this regard, the authors analyze the transitions from understanding economics as a “moral science” through the marginalist and formalist revolutions to taking economics as a field for formal ontologies and abstract mathematical models and tools. They then focus on tracing economic theory’s consistent adherence to the epistemological standard of scientific knowledge which was set by classical mechanics — the historical core of science in the modern era — together with the costs incurred by mathematical presentation and rejection of the ideal of “moral certainty”. The authors show how the loss of the empirical component and the growing issue of the substantive component of formal models have resulted in the “empirical turn” in economics. Using the example of neuroeconomics as the most radical attempt to naturalize the subject matter of economics, they outline the modern attempts to saturate economic research with empirical content and return to the project of a “physicalist” economics that will discover the laws of nature as the natural sciences have done. The authors argue from the ambivalent nature of the purposes and results of neuroeconomics to show that the empirical path of neuroeconomics, which was adopted in order to link the formal concepts of neoclassical economic theory with the experimental data and material models of neuroscience, leads instead to further degradation of the subject matter of economics as social objects are replaced with their presumed material infrastructure (neurophysiological correlates of social facts) without solving the problem of the empirical foundation for economic theory.

show abstract

Nöroiktisat Çerçevesinde İktisatta Multidisiplinerlik Mümkün mü?

SARIKAYA

AFŞAR

2022

İzmir İktisat Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışmada, iktisat teorisinin, kendi başına oldukça kapsamlı bir çalışma alanı olan, nöroiktisat disiplinine ihtiyaç duyup duymadığı sorgulanmakta ve nörobilim araçlarının soyut iktisadi yapıları somutlaştırılma noktasında sunabileceği olası katkılar tartışılmaktadır. Yirminci yüzyılın başlarında bilimsel paradigmadaki dönüşüm ile birlikte, egemen iktisat teorilerine yönelik eleştiriler 1930’lu yıllardan itibaren giderek artmış, ve 1990’lı yıllara gelindiğinde nörobilim alanındaki teknik gelişmeler, nöroiktisadın disiplinler arası bir alan olarak doğuşuna zemin hazırlamıştır. Nörobilimdeki gelişmeler Jevons’ın “kara kutu” olarak adlandırdığı çalışan belleğin işleyişini, bireylerin duygu ve düşüncelerinin izlenmesini mümkün kılmıştır. Bu bağlamda, geleneksel iktisat teorilerinin “gözlemlenemezlik” varsayımı geçerliliğini yitirmiş ve mevcut matematiksel modellerin nöral olarak detaylı modellerle yer değiştirmesinin önü açılmıştır. İktisat disiplini açısından ele alındığında, nöroiktisadın uzun vadedeki hedefi nöral detayların ihmal edilmediği ve matematiksel olarak kesin bir iktisadi seçim teorisi oluşturmaktır. Bu bağlamda, temel olarak iktisat, psikoloji ve nörobilim disiplinlerinin bir araya gelmesiyle ortaya çıkan yeni bir disiplinler arası çalışma alanı olan nöroiktisadın kavramları, kapsamı ve çalışma yöntemleri açısından anlaşılması önem arz etmektedir. Bu kapsamda, iktisadi karar mekanizmasının kesin bir titizlikle anlaşılması için disipliner arası çalışmaların elzem olduğu ön kabulünden hareketle, nöroiktisada giden yolda iktisadın geçirdiği dönüşüm, nöroiktisat metodolojisi ve nörobilim araçlarının nöroiktisadi çalışmalardaki işlevi tartışılmıştır

show abstract

Neuroeconomics: New Heart for Economics or New Face of Economic Imperialism

Cited by 3 publications

References 41 publications

Outlines of the Species Diversity of the Human-Oriented Economy

Outlines of the Species Diversity of the Human-Oriented Economy

Naturalizing the Subject of Economics: From Following the Norms of Natural Science to Owning the Laws of Nature

Nöroiktisat Çerçevesinde İktisatta Multidisiplinerlik Mümkün mü?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About