2019
DOI: 10.1177/0883073819852237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurodevelopmental Treatment (Bobath) for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Aim: To assess the effects of neurodevelopmental treatment for children with cerebral palsy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported in accordance to PRISMA Statement. Through a comprehensive literature search we considered all randomized clinical trials that compared neurodevelopmental treatment with conventional physical therapy for children with cerebral palsy. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
38
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In stark contrast, bottom-up, generic, and/or passive motor interventions are less effective and sometimes clearly ineffective for improving function and movement for children with cerebral palsy. These include craniosacral therapy [239][240][241], hyperbaric oxygen [234,235], neurodevelopmental therapy in the original passive format [108,[129][130][131][132], and sensory integration [3] (red lights). When viewed through the lens of neuroplasticity, these results are logical.…”
Section: Motor Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stark contrast, bottom-up, generic, and/or passive motor interventions are less effective and sometimes clearly ineffective for improving function and movement for children with cerebral palsy. These include craniosacral therapy [239][240][241], hyperbaric oxygen [234,235], neurodevelopmental therapy in the original passive format [108,[129][130][131][132], and sensory integration [3] (red lights). When viewed through the lens of neuroplasticity, these results are logical.…”
Section: Motor Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bobat kinesitherapy included neuro-developmental treatment: key joints, fixation, stimulation of equilibrium and upright reactions, development of motor skills, and automation of motor skills in everyday life [9,29].…”
Section: Materials and Methods:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the diagnostic and classification of cerebral motor disorders, the following kinesiology tests are most often used: Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) [7][8][9]; Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) [7,[10][11][12]; Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) [11,13,14]; Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS) [11,13,15]; Gross Motor Function Measurement (GMFM) [16]; Bimanual Fine Motor Function (BFMF) [1,7,10,17,18] and fidgety motors [4][5][6][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: …………………………………………………………………………………………………… Introduction:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic review of three randomized trials indicated that there are no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between Bobath therapy and traditional rehabilitation. However, two of these studies had methodological limitations for the use of Bobath therapy, and only one study provided data on the effect of this method on gross motor skills in children with cerebral palsy (Zanon et al, 2019). Most studies of Bobath therapy involved a small number of children.…”
Section: Figure 1: Changes Over Time In Gmfcs Levels Of Children With Spastic Diplegiamentioning
confidence: 99%