2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with prenatally diagnosed corpus callosal abnormalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yeh et al [5] revealed that hCC or pCCA was often associated with concomitant non-CNS anomalies. The rate of severe disability in the later was higher than that in patients with cCCA; however, this difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yeh et al [5] revealed that hCC or pCCA was often associated with concomitant non-CNS anomalies. The rate of severe disability in the later was higher than that in patients with cCCA; however, this difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent integrative review highlighted that in truly isolated CCA, neurodevelopmental outcomes can range from normal development in about 75% of the individuals to different levels of intellectual disability. About 12% of the individuals in this series had severe intellectual disability [4, 11], which made it challenging for antenatal counseling, when a fetus is diagnosed with apparently isolated CCA [5-7, 10]. For this reason, a cognitive outcome of isolated CCA remains a major concern with uncertain prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient described in this manuscript presented a mild form of cblD disease with a clinical onset at 10 years of age. However, the severe alterations found in corpus callosum are typically associated with neurodevelopmental problems [54,55]. We suggest that early versus late onset may follow a transition, although the precise moment at which the disease starts to produce cognitive and neurological symptoms is not known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…CCA was considered isolated when no other brain, spine, or extra-CNS anomalies were detected on ultrasound or MR imaging antenatally and no chromosomal anomalies were identified, in accordance with previous publications. 4,6,[13][14][15][16] In non-isolated CCA, associated anomalies were recorded. Severe global brain structural malformations that course without a CC (eg, holoprosencephaly, anencephaly) and the absence of the CC secondary to destructive lesions (eg, porencephaly) were excluded.…”
Section: Patients and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each option may be seen in isolation (no other fetal brain or body malformations) or in the context of a polymalformative or genetic condition. [1][2][3] In terms of outcome risk stratification, patients with associated CCA (aCCA) are at a high risk of neurodevelopmental delay, 4 while isolated CCA (iCCA) is associated with development within the normal range in up to 88% of children. [5][6][7][8][9] Other features, such as the presence of Probst bundles or sigmoid bundles, have been used inconsistently in an attempt to predict outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%