2019
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurodevelopmental outcome following prenatal diagnosis of a short corpus callosum

Abstract: Objective Data regarding the neurodevelopmental outcome of fetal short corpus callosum (CC) diagnosed according to standard reference charts is scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the finding is related to neurodevelopmental delay, and to examine reclassification to normal fetal CC length using CC length/EFW ratio. Method Historical prospective cohort study including pregnant women who were referred for fetal neurosonogram due to abnormal CC. Short CC was defined below the 5th percentile ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, even in normal fetuses, the prognosis of short or thick CC remains a matter of debate considering the very few data available. [21][22][23] Besides these already known CC anomalies associated with MMC, we also found PNH and cortical anomalies in 11 and 3% of the cases, respectively. Interestingly, in one of the two prenatal cases in which abnormal sylvian appearance was suspected, gyration was considered normal at postnatal imaging.…”
Section: Interpretationssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, even in normal fetuses, the prognosis of short or thick CC remains a matter of debate considering the very few data available. [21][22][23] Besides these already known CC anomalies associated with MMC, we also found PNH and cortical anomalies in 11 and 3% of the cases, respectively. Interestingly, in one of the two prenatal cases in which abnormal sylvian appearance was suspected, gyration was considered normal at postnatal imaging.…”
Section: Interpretationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Overall, the existence of these additional callosal anomalies raises the question of their impact on the postnatal development of these children and requires further evaluation. Indeed, even in normal fetuses, the prognosis of short or thick CC remains a matter of debate considering the very few data available 21,22,23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial qualitative analysis of 27 studies was performed. After this initial analysis, three studies published prior to 1990 were excluded, yielding a total of 24 studies included in the final analysis 12–35 . Table S2 shows a summary of the studies using the PICOS framework as a guide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that first report, advances in fetal imaging, using both ultrasound and, more recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have led to increased recognition of fetal CC pathologies. CC anomalies are categorized broadly 7–9 into either complete (CACC) or partial (PACC) agenesis of the CC, but the prenatal imaging literature also includes a variety of descriptive terms, such as short, thick or thin CC, for these pathologies 10–35 . Developmental anomalies of the CC can be isolated or associated with other central nervous system (CNS) or non‐CNS malformations, and known etiological factors range from genetic factors and teratogens to infections and ischemia 9,36–40 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsur et al showed that the ratio between the CC length and estimated fetal weight had a strong linear correlation and suggested adjusting CC length to fetal growth parameters. Meidan et al also used the ratio between CC length to estimate of fetal weight (EFW) in their study that evaluated the neurodevelopmental outcome of prenatally diagnosed SCC. Shen et al showed that in a sizeable proportion of cases of PACC detected prenatally, the shape of the cavum septi pellucidi was abnormal and suggested this feature was an additional indirect sign of PACC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%