2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10517-019-04442-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurodegenerative Changes in Rat Brain in Streptozotocin Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Follow-up period after the injection: the majority of the published studies applied a one month long post-injection period (Li et al, 2012;Correia et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 2013;Hashemi-Firouzi et al, 2018;Zappa Villar et al, 2018) or even shorter, 2-3 weeks intervals (Blokland and Jolles, 1993;Sonkusare et al, 2005;Jee et al, 2008;Deng et al, 2009;Yamini et al, 2018). There are some studies where longer, 3 months follow-up periods were used (Salkovic-Petrisic et al, 2006, Salkovic-Petrisic et al, 2011Knezovic et al, 2015;Samy et al, 2016; Knezovic et al, 2018;Ilieva et al, 2019;Voronkov et al, 2019) In two very much informative longitudinal studies (Knezovic et al, 2015;Osmanovic Barilar et al, 2015) changes/impairments were followed up to 9 months. In our study we chose a 3-3.5 months follow up period considering that the method is intended to be a model of Alzheimer's disease, which would imply slowly evolving long term pathological changes and that it allowed to conduct learning tasks requiring several weeks training, like 5-CSRTT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up period after the injection: the majority of the published studies applied a one month long post-injection period (Li et al, 2012;Correia et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 2013;Hashemi-Firouzi et al, 2018;Zappa Villar et al, 2018) or even shorter, 2-3 weeks intervals (Blokland and Jolles, 1993;Sonkusare et al, 2005;Jee et al, 2008;Deng et al, 2009;Yamini et al, 2018). There are some studies where longer, 3 months follow-up periods were used (Salkovic-Petrisic et al, 2006, Salkovic-Petrisic et al, 2011Knezovic et al, 2015;Samy et al, 2016; Knezovic et al, 2018;Ilieva et al, 2019;Voronkov et al, 2019) In two very much informative longitudinal studies (Knezovic et al, 2015;Osmanovic Barilar et al, 2015) changes/impairments were followed up to 9 months. In our study we chose a 3-3.5 months follow up period considering that the method is intended to be a model of Alzheimer's disease, which would imply slowly evolving long term pathological changes and that it allowed to conduct learning tasks requiring several weeks training, like 5-CSRTT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies using the ICV-STZ model are focused on the description of the behavioral [ 20 ] and morphological [ 21 ] aspects of the disease. The molecular factors of the ICV-STZ model are often assessed through techniques that target only a few genes, such as qRT-PCR [ 22 ] and Western blot [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of studies have shown that intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of streptozotocin, a glucosamine-nitrosourea compound with diabetogenic action, triggers a sporadic AD-like pathology. [14][15][16] In this study, we aimed to assess the effects of a posttraining MFB-ICSS treatment on spatial learning and memory, neurodegeneration, and serum expression of 14 neural plasticity-related miRNAs in a rat model of sporadic AD created by ICV injection of streptozotocin. The first experiment was designed to confirm whether rats that received streptozotocin exhibited the main hallmarks of AD according to the references mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%