Behavioral Pharmacology 1975
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2634-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurochemical changes associated with schedule-controlled behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly 20 years ago, Seiden, Sparber, and their colleagues (e.g., see reviews by Seiden, MacPhail, & Oglesby, 1975, and by Sparber, 1975) initiated experiments designed to examine neurochemical changes correlated with different types of schedule-controlled behavior. Studies by Seiden's group used drugs such as alpha-methyltyrosine, which blocks the synthesis of catecholamines, to determine whether performances under FI or FR schedules were differentially affected and also whether catecholamine content in the brains of rats responding under these schedules was different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly 20 years ago, Seiden, Sparber, and their colleagues (e.g., see reviews by Seiden, MacPhail, & Oglesby, 1975, and by Sparber, 1975) initiated experiments designed to examine neurochemical changes correlated with different types of schedule-controlled behavior. Studies by Seiden's group used drugs such as alpha-methyltyrosine, which blocks the synthesis of catecholamines, to determine whether performances under FI or FR schedules were differentially affected and also whether catecholamine content in the brains of rats responding under these schedules was different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, again depending on the procedure used for data analysis and the FRD difficulty being examined, maximal accuracy values associated with these curves were reduced by these variables. Together, these findings and the central effects that FRDT and other behavioral procedures previously have been shown to produce neurochemical changes in the brain (e.g., Sparber, 1975;Stodgell et al, 1996) suggest that FRD acquisition was inhibited by a combination of competitive (surmountable) and noncompetitive (insurmountable) central processes (mixed competitive-noncompetitive inhibition; see Ariens, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, it is the aggregate information derived from the three different methods as a group that allows considerable confidence in the magnitudes and directions of the learning curve shifts and, therefore, in the use of curve shifts for the future assessment of the underlying neurochemical processes involved. Regardless, the results indicated in Table 1 and the neurochemical effects that FRDT and other behavioral procedures have previously been shown to produce in the brain (e.g., Sparber, 1975; Stodgell et al, 1996) together indicate that FRD acquisition was inhibited by a combination of competitive (surmountable) and noncompetitive (insurmountable) central processes (mixed competitive-noncompetitive inhibition; see Ariens, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results, demonstrating that the behavioral effects of drugs can be shown to rapidly oscillate from enhancement to depression depending simply on the control of behavior by external stimuli and the associated schedules of reinforcement, are difficult to explain purely from a mechanistic or pharmacological perspective. There have been attempts to evaluate the influence of schedules of reinforcement on neurochemical changes associated with schedule-controlled behavior (Lewy and Seiden, 1972;Seiden et al, 1975;Sparber, 1975;Miyauchi et al, 1988a,b;Barrett and Hoffmann, 1991), but very little progress has been made in this area that might permit a better understanding of the dynamic interactions between the behavioral and neurochemical processes that could shed further light on these early findings.…”
Section: Studies On Behavior I Differential Sensitivity To Pentobarmentioning
confidence: 99%