1978
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(78)90087-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurochemical and operant behavioral studies of a strain of alcohol-preferring rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive t score indicates a difference between genotypes in the same direction as the drinking difference, while a negative t score indicates a difference between the genotypes in the opposite direction as the drinking difference. (Bachtell et al, 2003;Belknap et al, 1977;Broadbent et al, 1996;Cunningham, 1995a;Grahame and Cunningham, 1997;Meliska et al, 1995;Risinger and Cunningham, 1995) C57BL/6J v BALB/ 2.61 (Froehlich et al, 1988;Murphy et al, 1989;Penn et al, 1978;Ritz et al, 1994;Samson et al, 1998;Schechter, 1992;Stewart et al, 1996) HAD v LAD 26 gen I ++ 10% 5.25 (Ritz et al, 1994;Samson et al, 1998) HAD Alcohol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 February 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive t score indicates a difference between genotypes in the same direction as the drinking difference, while a negative t score indicates a difference between the genotypes in the opposite direction as the drinking difference. (Bachtell et al, 2003;Belknap et al, 1977;Broadbent et al, 1996;Cunningham, 1995a;Grahame and Cunningham, 1997;Meliska et al, 1995;Risinger and Cunningham, 1995) C57BL/6J v BALB/ 2.61 (Froehlich et al, 1988;Murphy et al, 1989;Penn et al, 1978;Ritz et al, 1994;Samson et al, 1998;Schechter, 1992;Stewart et al, 1996) HAD v LAD 26 gen I ++ 10% 5.25 (Ritz et al, 1994;Samson et al, 1998) HAD Alcohol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 February 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, P rats will readily operantly self-administer EtOH. Using a one-lever design procedure, free-fed P rats will exceed 1000 bar presses for EtOH in a 24-hr period (Penn et al, 1978). In a two-lever procedure (EtOH and water) with ad libitum food, P rats will operantly selfadminister greater than 9 g/kg/day of 15 or 20% EtOH (Murphy et al, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Indiana alcohol-preferring (P) (e.g., Files et al, 1992Files et al, , 1993Murphy et al, 1989;Penn et al, 1978;Ritz et al, 1994a,b;Samson et al, 1998;Schwarz-Stevens et al, 1991), ALKO alcohol-accepting (AA) (Files et al, 1997;Sinclair, 1989, 1990;Ritz et al, 1986Ritz et al, , 1989a, and Indiana high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) (Ritz et al, 1994a,b;Samson et al, 1998) rats have been described to press a lever to obtain pharmacologically relevant amounts of ethanol, in most cases comparable with those consumed under the home cage, two-bottle regimen. In contrast, selectively bred ethanol-nonpreferring Indiana alcoholnonpreferring (NP), ALKO alcohol nonaccepting (ANA), and Indiana low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats have been reported to display minimal degrees of lever pressing for ethanol, consistent with their avoidance of the ethanol solutions under the two-bottle paradigm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%