The idea that beat induction derives from body movement is attractive, but until recently unequivocal empirical evidence of such a linkage has been elusive. provide evidence that individual differences in locomotion affect preferred beat rate, and Phillips-Silver & Trainor (2005 show that metrical interpretation is affected by movement. These studies examine different aspects of rhythm processing, but together provide converging evidence for pervasive movement/auditory interactions. MUSICAL beat induction-the perceptual extraction of a regular underlying beat pattern from a temporal sound pattern-is perhaps the most fundamental prerequisite for the emergence of musical behaviour. The process of beat induction has therefore been of great interest to researchers studying the evolutionary and cultural origins of music (Clark, 1999;Cross, 2003;Fitch, 2005;Molinari, Leggio, De Martin, Cerasa, & Thaut, 2003;. The hypothesis that musical beat induction derives from body movement is attractive because the tempo range of optimal musical pulse perception, around 300-900 ms onset-to-onset, is similar to that of locomotion (Fraisse, 1982). Furthermore, rhythmic body movement is evolutionarily ancient, and music and dance are inseparable in many human cultures (Wallin, Merker, & Brown, 2000).However, it is not immediately obvious how to test the hypothesis that feeling the beat derives from body movement. Until recently, there was little empirical evidence for a direct link between musical beat induction and body movement, but two interesting approaches have been presented in the last couple of years. measured individual differences in anthropometric factors that affect the tempo of locomotion, and showed that these individual differences vary with individual differences in auditory perceptual preferred beat rate, suggesting that preferred beat rate is related to rhythmic body movement. Trainor (2005, 2007, under review) showed that body movement on either every second or every third beat of an ambiguous auditory rhythm pattern (i.e., a pattern without physical accents) affects whether the beat of the auditory pattern is perceived as being in duple or triple time, thus demonstrating a multisensory connection between movement and auditory beat induction.The methodologies of and Phillips-Silver & Trainor (2005, under review) are very different, and together they provide quite convincing converging evidence for movement/auditory interactions for musical beat perception. However, because the two approaches are quite different in their emphasis, a comparison between the two can be instructive in considering the mechanisms involved in the interaction, the levels at which they operate, and how they develop. Todd et al. focus on preferred beat rates and individual differences, an emphasis that allows the examination of correlations between perceptual preferences and anthropometric factors that affect locomotion tempos. A direct measure of preferred walking speed might have revealed a stronger correlation with percepti...