Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism? 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5369-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobiology of Asperger Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DAS-II scores were available for 43 (95.6%) ASD participants and 34 (100%) NT participants. To account for the well-documented discrepancies between verbal and non-verbal cognitive performance among autistic children (Coolican et al, 2008;Lincoln et al, 1998) and to best align with prior PAF studies (Dickinson et al, 2018;Dickinson et al, 2022;Edgar et al, 2019), analyses were focused on NVIQ. Note: Significance values correspond to results of independent samples t tests or chi-squared tests to assess between-group differences on key demographic measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAS-II scores were available for 43 (95.6%) ASD participants and 34 (100%) NT participants. To account for the well-documented discrepancies between verbal and non-verbal cognitive performance among autistic children (Coolican et al, 2008;Lincoln et al, 1998) and to best align with prior PAF studies (Dickinson et al, 2018;Dickinson et al, 2022;Edgar et al, 2019), analyses were focused on NVIQ. Note: Significance values correspond to results of independent samples t tests or chi-squared tests to assess between-group differences on key demographic measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size and direction of the group level verbalnonverbal discrepancy have varied across samples in the literature, and the school-age SSC sample is another data point within the range. The variation likely reflects small sample sizes as well as sampling differences in functioning level [e.g., Siegel et al, 1996], co-occurring conditions [e.g., Kanai et al, 2017], the selection on IQ [e.g., Lennen et al, 2010], diagnostic criteria [e.g., Ghaziuddin & Mountain-Kimchi, 2004, Lincoln et al, 1998], and stringent genetic inclusion criteria [e.g., Nowell et al, 2015 and the present study]. All of these factors likely affect the verbal-nonverbal discrepancy in autistic individuals, providing a further rationale to avoid incorporating a discrepancy into diagnostic decision-making.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of IQ scores among children with autism often found uneven cognitive profiles with nonverbal scores higher than verbal scores, regardless of the particular cognitive instrument used. A review of 16 published studies involving 333 ASD children tested with a Wechsler scale found an N‐V difference of 9.3 points, that is, greater than 0.60 standard deviation difference [Lincoln, Courchesne, Allen, Hanson, & Ene, 1998]. Other individual studies frequently reported N > V with Wechsler scales [Giofrè et al, 2019; Jones & Lord, 2013; Kuriakose, 2014; Li, Du, Luan, Li, & Ousley, 2017; Mayes & Calhoun, 2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En metaanalyse af unders0gelser af intelligensprofiler hos personer med autisme har vist, at den nonverbale og visuelle-praktiske intelligensfunktion generelt er relativ st<Erkere end den verbale intelligensfunktion (Lincoln et al, 1998).…”
Section: Central Kohunclassified