2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobiological Correlates of Social Conformity and Independence During Mental Rotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
207
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
17
207
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…whether a negative group judgment led participants to selectively focus on unattractive aspects of a face). Berns et al (2005) found that social conformity in a mental rotation task was associated with increased activity in task specific brain areas (i.e. the occipital-parietal network).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…whether a negative group judgment led participants to selectively focus on unattractive aspects of a face). Berns et al (2005) found that social conformity in a mental rotation task was associated with increased activity in task specific brain areas (i.e. the occipital-parietal network).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Put differently, going along with the group increased activity particularly in the neural network that normally is involved in mental rotation. Berns et al (2005) concluded from these results that participants seemed to see the wrong answer under social pressure. In contrast, participants who did not conform with the others showed increased amygdala and caudate activity, possibly signifying an emotional toll for standing up for one's belief.…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Social Influence On Decision Making In mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Unfortunately, the question of which brain mechanisms are at work when we integrate others' opinions during decision making has largely escaped the attention of neuroscientists. To the best of our knowledge, only one fMRI study has examined the neural correlates of social influence during decision making (Berns et al, 2005). Instead of having participants decide between different line lengths, as in Asch (1952Asch ( , 1956), Berns et al asked participants to mentally rotate 2-D line drawings of 3-D objects to decide whether two objects were the "same" or "different" (Shepard & Metzler, 1971).…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Social Influence On Decision Making In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masternarrative analysis calls this process coercive cohesion. [22] In this regard, Islamic MNs will only be successful if they can perform a vital de-tormenting psychosocial task for European Muslims whose internal, evolutionarily inherited cognitive ambiguity is intensified by an external environment of competing social identities and group loyalties. European Muslims today typically find themselves caught within a field of competing social identities and group loyalties.…”
Section: Once You Have Accepted a Theory And Used It As A Tool In Youmentioning
confidence: 99%