2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobiological correlates of cue-reactivity in alcohol-use disorders: A voxel-wise meta-analysis of fMRI studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
5
64
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, insula and temporal gyri suffer from gray matter reduction, among many other structures, linked to AUD (Yang et al, 2016;Rolland et al, 2020). Continuing with fMRI data, taskbased studies found important effects of AUD in the insula cortex and the temporal gyrus including hyperconnectivity as a reaction to alcohol stimuli (Strosche et al, 2021), abnormal neural activity (Karch et al, 2015), abnormal brain function in verbal working memory (Park et al, 2011), and indications of neurobiological correlates to cue-reactivity (Zeng et al, 2021). Comparative observations from task-based studies mentioned in this paragraph, previous AUD classification reports (Zhu et al, 2018;Fede et al, 2019;Kamarajan et al, 2020), and those in the current work suggests that insula and temporal gyrus fMRI abnormalities linked to AUD are more prominent during exteroceptive brain function of task execution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, insula and temporal gyri suffer from gray matter reduction, among many other structures, linked to AUD (Yang et al, 2016;Rolland et al, 2020). Continuing with fMRI data, taskbased studies found important effects of AUD in the insula cortex and the temporal gyrus including hyperconnectivity as a reaction to alcohol stimuli (Strosche et al, 2021), abnormal neural activity (Karch et al, 2015), abnormal brain function in verbal working memory (Park et al, 2011), and indications of neurobiological correlates to cue-reactivity (Zeng et al, 2021). Comparative observations from task-based studies mentioned in this paragraph, previous AUD classification reports (Zhu et al, 2018;Fede et al, 2019;Kamarajan et al, 2020), and those in the current work suggests that insula and temporal gyrus fMRI abnormalities linked to AUD are more prominent during exteroceptive brain function of task execution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a whole, studies focusing on self-reported craving indicate that craving is a meaningful clinical construct. With some exceptions-such as studies of attentional bias and response inhibition (reviewed below), as well as those using electrophysiological (e.g., Herrmann et al, 2001;Martins et al, 2019;Petit et al, 2013) and brain imaging methods (see Schacht et al, 2013 andZeng et al, 2021 for meta-analyses)-however, more work is needed to understand why craving is clinically significant. In other words, what happens when one is craving that may lead to alcohol use or relapse?…”
Section: Value Of Conceptualizing Craving As a Clinical Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying neural mechanisms of drug cue-reactivity 15 are typically mapped while participants passively view drug and non-drug stimuli during functional MRI (fMRI). These mechanisms involve the recruitment of the NAcc and vmPFC/OFC in response to drug vs. neutral cues in individuals with alcohol, 16,17 nicotine, 18,19 cannabis, 20 or cocaine [21][22][23] use disorders. Increased drug cue related activity in these cortico-striatal regions is associated with higher self-reported craving in alcohol, 24 nicotine, 18 and cannabis 20 addiction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%