2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2009.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobehavioral effect of chronic and bolus doses of methylmercury following prenatal exposure in C57BL/6 weanling mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, exposed animals showed no neurological signs, weight loss, reproductive toxicity, or changes in physical appearance even as they showed significant, if subtle, neurotoxicity as adults (Newland, 2012; Newland et al, 2008). Such sensitivity has been reported with auditory, visual, and somatosensory deficits in monkeys (Rice, 1996) and in behavioral studies with rodents (Bourdineaud et al, 2008; Bourdineaud et al, 2011; Castoldi et al, 2008; Liang et al, 2009; Montgomery et al, 2008; Newland et al, 2008; Onishchenko et al, 2008; Weiss et al, 2005) and are linked to disturbances in the development of the dopamine systems (Rasmussen and Newland, 2001; Reed and Newland, 2009). …”
Section: The Developmental Window Is Importantmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…That is, exposed animals showed no neurological signs, weight loss, reproductive toxicity, or changes in physical appearance even as they showed significant, if subtle, neurotoxicity as adults (Newland, 2012; Newland et al, 2008). Such sensitivity has been reported with auditory, visual, and somatosensory deficits in monkeys (Rice, 1996) and in behavioral studies with rodents (Bourdineaud et al, 2008; Bourdineaud et al, 2011; Castoldi et al, 2008; Liang et al, 2009; Montgomery et al, 2008; Newland et al, 2008; Onishchenko et al, 2008; Weiss et al, 2005) and are linked to disturbances in the development of the dopamine systems (Rasmussen and Newland, 2001; Reed and Newland, 2009). …”
Section: The Developmental Window Is Importantmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For these reasons, the study focused on brain monoamine systems and behaviors known to be impacted by MeHg (Ceccatelli et al, 2013; Liang et al, 2009; Montgomery et al, 2008; Newland et al, 2013; Newland et al, 2004; Onishchenko et al, 2007; Peters et al, 2010; Yoshida et al, 2011) and/or mediated by brain monoamine systems (Carratu et al, 2006; Castoldi et al, 2006; Coccini et al, 2011; Farina et al, 2011). First, multiple examples of the effects of MeHg effects that were enhanced by PS, or occurring only under conditions of PS, i.e., being unmasked by PS, were observed, including changes in brain neurochemistry and in behavior, particularly in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some, but not all (Davidson et al, 2011) cohorts of children, prenatal MeHg in children has been associated with neurocognitive deficits, including increased diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and attention-related behaviors (Boucher et al, 2012), impaired visual recognition memory (Oken et al, 2005; Sagiv et al, 2012), and cognition and IQ (intelligence quotient) reductions (Jedrychowski et al, 2007; Lederman et al, 2008; Oken et al, 2008). Experimental animal studies likewise show deficits resulting from prenatal MeHg exposures in corresponding behavioral domains including deficits in learning, discrimination/transition reversal and working memory, increased perseverative behavior and increased behaviors interpreted as anxiety (Ceccatelli et al, 2013; Liang et al, 2009; Montgomery et al, 2008; Newland et al, 2013; Newland et al, 2004; Onishchenko et al, 2007; Peters et al, 2010; Yoshida et al, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is far below the doses of MeHg given to mice found in the literature. A literature survey of the recent articles dealing with MeHg contamination in mice through diet or drinking water these last 2 years, identifies the commonly-used daily doses which were in decreasing order of concentration: 5.4 [47], 2 [40], 1.4 [48], 1 [49,50], and 0.5 mg MeHg/kg body weight [51]. These concentrations are 5400- to 500-times greater than the contamination pressure we have used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%