1996
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890230075014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro-otological Findings After Radiosurgery for Acoustic Neurinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 74 articles, involving 5,825 patients, met the criteria of the established protocol and were evaluated (Supplementary Table 1), 2,4,5,10,17,19,26,29,35,41,[43][44][45][46]53,[56][57][58]60,[62][63][64] and the overall rate of hearing preservation in these studies was 57% (Table 1). 1,[11][12][13]28,39,47,55,62,63,[94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110]<...>…”
Section: Systematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 74 articles, involving 5,825 patients, met the criteria of the established protocol and were evaluated (Supplementary Table 1), 2,4,5,10,17,19,26,29,35,41,[43][44][45][46]53,[56][57][58]60,[62][63][64] and the overall rate of hearing preservation in these studies was 57% (Table 1). 1,[11][12][13]28,39,47,55,62,63,[94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110]<...>…”
Section: Systematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the numerous variables associated with assessing hearing preservation after radiosurgery in the literature, the hearing preservation rate after radiosurgery is not well defined. 37,53,54 The reported rates of hearing preservation vary between 11% and 77%, with most recent reports between 50% and 70% range. 4,11,18,[28][29][30]35,39,44,46,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] Clearly, the reported outcomes do not provide the clinician with a consensus estimate of expected hearing preservation outcomes when counseling patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) are, in terms of hearing preservation, generally comparable to, or better than, those of microsurgery. [1][2][3] Furthermore, significant correlations exist between hearing loss, tumor size and treatment dose. 1,2,4 However, the significance of electrophysiological findings such as auditory brainstem responses (ABR) have not been investigated previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Furthermore, significant correlations exist between hearing loss, tumor size and treatment dose. 1,2,4 However, the significance of electrophysiological findings such as auditory brainstem responses (ABR) have not been investigated previously. In this prospective study we analyzed hearing outcomes after GKRS for VS and sought to identify the relevant preoperative prognostic factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with an increased toxicity to the facial and trigeminal nerves, as compared with FSRT. With FSRT, rates of treatment-related toxicity to the facial nerve of 0-3% can be found in the literature [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. With microsurgery, the rate of cranial nerve toxicity depends strongly on the size of the vestibular schwannoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%