2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro-Ophthalmologic Response to Repetitive Subconcussive Head Impacts

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Subconcussive head impacts have emerged as a complex public health concern. The oculomotor system is sensitive to brain trauma; however, neuro-ophthalmologic response to subconcussive head impacts remains unclear.OBJECTIVE To examine whether subconcussive head impacts cause impairments in neuro-ophthalmologic function as measured by the King-Devick test (KDT) and oculomotor function as measured by the near point of convergence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn this randomized clinical trial, adul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An average linear head acceleration from a header ranges between 26 and 32 g [ 2 ], while regular corner or goal kicks (~50mph) yield accelerations above 50 g [ 40 ]. This study agreed with our previous studies [ 2 , 41 ] in that 10 headings did not increase concussion-related symptoms in study participants, ensuring that our intervention is in fact “subconcussive.” All participants stood approximately 40 ft (12.2 m) in front of the JUGS machine. Participants in the heading group were instructed to head the soccer ball with their forehead and aim the ball towards a researcher standing approximately 16 ft (4.9 m) in front of the participant.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An average linear head acceleration from a header ranges between 26 and 32 g [ 2 ], while regular corner or goal kicks (~50mph) yield accelerations above 50 g [ 40 ]. This study agreed with our previous studies [ 2 , 41 ] in that 10 headings did not increase concussion-related symptoms in study participants, ensuring that our intervention is in fact “subconcussive.” All participants stood approximately 40 ft (12.2 m) in front of the JUGS machine. Participants in the heading group were instructed to head the soccer ball with their forehead and aim the ball towards a researcher standing approximately 16 ft (4.9 m) in front of the participant.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There is evidence to suggest that even a single practice session involving head contact, such as heading a ball in soccer, can result in impairment. 23 Magnetic resonance imaging studies have demonstrated that players exposed to repetitive head impacts over the course of a season show significant abnormalities compared to controls over the same time period and that these abnormalities are related to the extent of exposure to head impacts. 4 , 5 , 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NPC was assessed based on protocols published in previous studies [6][7][8][9] . Participants were seated with their heads in an anatomical position.…”
Section: Near Point Of Convergence (Npc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggest that oculomotor functions can reflect subtle sensory impairment caused by subconcussive head impact incidents. For example, the near point of convergence (NPC), which measures the closest point of focus before diplopia occurs 5) , has been shown to in-crease from subconcussive head impacts [6][7][8][9] . In one study, 10 acute soccer headings immediately worsened NPC values by as much as 40% compared to baseline values, and this impairment persisted for more than 24 h 6,7) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation