2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-0255(00)00009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro-fuzzy clustering of radiographic tibia image data using type 2 fuzzy sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [10,50], the training set and testing set are obtained using the cross-validation technique. All papers show comparative results against T1 FS as well as other classifier techniques, where, in accordance with the classification rates, the approach based on T2 FS [50,53] is better than T1 FS approaches and other known methods. Based on these results, we can observe that T2 fuzzy techniques perform better when applied to classification applications, especially when digital images are incomplete or involve some noise, in which case it is difficult for the system to determine if a pixel is part or not of a class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [10,50], the training set and testing set are obtained using the cross-validation technique. All papers show comparative results against T1 FS as well as other classifier techniques, where, in accordance with the classification rates, the approach based on T2 FS [50,53] is better than T1 FS approaches and other known methods. Based on these results, we can observe that T2 fuzzy techniques perform better when applied to classification applications, especially when digital images are incomplete or involve some noise, in which case it is difficult for the system to determine if a pixel is part or not of a class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Papers reviewed in this section [10,50,53] use real images, where [50,53] are focused on medical applications. They use different metrics to evaluate the classification accuracy in which we can single out the Friedman test, contingency coefficient, and Kappa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the method basing on fuzzy logic adopt Type-1 fuzzy sets representing uncertainties with the range between [0,1] and type-1 fuzzy sets is having a precise membership function where its elements are real number. To handle [28] this difficulties a type-2 fuzzy sets is introduced which is most able to handle the uncertainty related to noisy and non-stationary than type-1 fuzzy set along with allowing uncertainty [29][30][31][32] to its associated membership degree. For the prediction of stock price Chih-Feng et al presented a type-2 neuro-fuzzy model where [28] a self constructed clustering method designed the type-2 fuzzy rules and then refined it by a hybrid algorithm.…”
Section: Psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these algorithms can smooth noise to a certain extent, effectively solve the problem of pixel uncertainty caused by the spatial correlation of pixels, and thus improve the segmentation accuracy of the algorithms, they cannot deal with the influence of uncertainty of decision-making on the segmentation results in high-resolution image segmentation. In recent years, type-2 fuzzy theory (Karnik and Mendel., 2001;Jonr et al, 2000;Liang and Mendel .,2001;Mendel., 2000) , applied to deal with the uncertainty problems, is a new method. Based on this theory, the image model with the primary membership function and secondary membership function are built, which can effectively deal with the above two kinds of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%