2011 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium 2011
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2011.5972771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro-fuzzy approach in microwave filter tuning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems a fuss to use RL, since other methods, such as training supervised learning models [5,6,14,16,32] or to study the physical characteristics of the cavity filter [3,[10][11][12], can still achieve the same goal; in most cases, those methods also do not need a large number of iterations. However, these methods always need a pretuned filter model as a benchmark or experienced tuning experts for guidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems a fuss to use RL, since other methods, such as training supervised learning models [5,6,14,16,32] or to study the physical characteristics of the cavity filter [3,[10][11][12], can still achieve the same goal; in most cases, those methods also do not need a large number of iterations. However, these methods always need a pretuned filter model as a benchmark or experienced tuning experts for guidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Zhou et al exploited Support Vector Regression (SVR) to construct metamodels between screw rotations and coupling matrix change [6,14]; the screw rotations are not measured but obtained from two optimization procedures, and the calculation of coupling matrix also brings uncertainties. Furthermore, fuzzy logic control [7,15], neural-fuzzy control [16], Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) [17], and regularized deep belief network (R-DBN) [18] have also been applied in modeling cavity filters. These data-driven methods learn models simply from pregathered data without analyzing the complex theoretical and physical characteristics of the filter product, eliminating the error produced by the difference between the ideal model and the real product.…”
Section: Automatic Cavity Filter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%