2017
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2017.1359422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro-adaptive cooperative tracking control with prescribed performance of unknown higher-order nonlinear multi-agent systems

Abstract: Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic convergence of the tracking error e i , from a given large set to a given narrow set in accordance with (32) and (33) Remark 1. In accordance with the discussion in [25,29], knowing the upper bound and the sign of e i (0) is sufficient to force the error to satisfy the performance constraints and maintain the error regulation within predefined dynamically reducing boundaries for all t > 0. If the condition in (32) or (33) is met, the maximum overshoot is sufficient to be bounded by ±δξ i , the steady-state error is bounded by ±ξ ∞ i , and |e i | is trapped between ξ i and δξ i as presented in Fig.…”
Section: B Prescribed Performancementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The systematic convergence of the tracking error e i , from a given large set to a given narrow set in accordance with (32) and (33) Remark 1. In accordance with the discussion in [25,29], knowing the upper bound and the sign of e i (0) is sufficient to force the error to satisfy the performance constraints and maintain the error regulation within predefined dynamically reducing boundaries for all t > 0. If the condition in (32) or (33) is met, the maximum overshoot is sufficient to be bounded by ±δξ i , the steady-state error is bounded by ±ξ ∞ i , and |e i | is trapped between ξ i and δξ i as presented in Fig.…”
Section: B Prescribed Performancementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Thus,ξ/ξ ≤ 0. According to the equation (20) of Lemma 1, the expression in (77) is negative semidefinite. Thus, the inequality in (76) becomes…”
Section: B Direct Stochastic Estimator With Prescribed Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transformation enables to maintain the error within dynamically reducing sets enabling the attainment of the prescribed performance measures. The systematic convergence with predefined measures has been applied successfully in different applications, for instance 2 DOF planar robot [19], unknown high-order nonlinear networked systems [20], event-triggered control [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3. As detailed in [7,11,15], knowing the sign of e i (0) is sufficient to maintain the same robust controller for all t > 0 and satisfy the performance constraints since switching does not occur after t = 0.…”
Section: Prescribed Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-agent distributed control in a way addresses many problems such as nonlinearities, unmodeled dynamics, uncertainties, and disturbances. It is often conceived that closed loop characteristics (transient and steady state error for instance) are analytically rigorous [7,11,15]. With prescribed performance however, such characteristics have been mapped to a relatively smaller set with constrained convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%