2023
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural tracking of continuous acoustics: properties, speech‐specificity and open questions

Benedikt Zoefel,
Anne Kösem

Abstract: Human speech is a particularly relevant acoustic stimulus for our species, due to its role of information transmission during communication. Speech is inherently a dynamic signal, and a recent line of research focused on neural activity following the temporal structure of speech. We review findings that characterise neural dynamics in the processing of continuous acoustics and that allow us to compare these dynamics with temporal aspects in human speech. We highlight properties and constraints that both neural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 213 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the listener shifted attention, we observed intertwined fluctuations of INS at the switching time point; that is, INS between the listener and the to-beignored speaker was significantly suppressed, whereas INS between the listener and the to-be-attended speaker was significantly enhanced. Current oscillatory models of speech processing suggest that different neural oscillations decode distinct levels of speech information and that fast oscillations (gamma) are hierarchically phaselocked to slow oscillations (alpha, theta, or both; Ding & Simon, 2014;Giraud & Poeppel, 2012;Zoefel & Kösem, 2024). In other words, low-frequency oscillations impose periods of inhibition and excitation on high-frequency neural dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the listener shifted attention, we observed intertwined fluctuations of INS at the switching time point; that is, INS between the listener and the to-beignored speaker was significantly suppressed, whereas INS between the listener and the to-be-attended speaker was significantly enhanced. Current oscillatory models of speech processing suggest that different neural oscillations decode distinct levels of speech information and that fast oscillations (gamma) are hierarchically phaselocked to slow oscillations (alpha, theta, or both; Ding & Simon, 2014;Giraud & Poeppel, 2012;Zoefel & Kösem, 2024). In other words, low-frequency oscillations impose periods of inhibition and excitation on high-frequency neural dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%