2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00134-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural timing of visual implicit categorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that unfamiliar logographic writings might elicit an N1 response comparable to or even stronger than that elicited by familiar logographic writings. Consistently, a previous ERP study revealed a stronger N1 for Asiatic characters than for letters even for subjects who had no experience with Asiatic characters (Pernet et al, 2003). Stronger fusiform activation has also been found for Chinese than for English stimuli even when the subjects were English speakers and had only limited exposure to the Chinese language (Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: N1 Response Is Modulated By Writing System and Visual Complesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that unfamiliar logographic writings might elicit an N1 response comparable to or even stronger than that elicited by familiar logographic writings. Consistently, a previous ERP study revealed a stronger N1 for Asiatic characters than for letters even for subjects who had no experience with Asiatic characters (Pernet et al, 2003). Stronger fusiform activation has also been found for Chinese than for English stimuli even when the subjects were English speakers and had only limited exposure to the Chinese language (Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: N1 Response Is Modulated By Writing System and Visual Complesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…So far, researchers have compared native words/letters with false fonts (Eulitz et al, 2000;Schendan et al, 1998;Wong et al, 2005), symbols Brem et al, 2005;Gros et al, 2002;Maurer et al, 2005b;McCandliss et al, 1997; Moscoso del Prado Martin et al, 2006;Tarkiainen et al, 2002Tarkiainen et al, , 1999, foreign writings (Huang et al, 2004;Pernet et al, 2003;Wong et al, 2005), letter strings (Bentin et al, 1999;Cohen et al, 2000;Martin et al, 2006;Proverbio et al, 2004), pseudowords (Proverbio et al, 2004;Shirahama et al, 2004;Wydell et al, 2003), and second-language words/letters (Liu and Perfetti, 2003;Wong et al, 2005). Furthermore, there was a study that compared native and foreign speakers on the same stimuli (Proverbio et al, 2006).…”
Section: N1 and Visual Word Form Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was found, the amplitude of the visual Р2 increases with increase in the stimulus complexity [69]. It was also mentioned that the amplitude of the Р2 wave noticeably depends on the activity of the nonspecific cerebral systems (in particular, on the functional state of the RF).…”
Section: Components Of Eps and Their Possible Functional Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Similarly for the Dutch participants, though individual pinyin graphemes can be read in analogy to Latin alphabets, the long strings pose a challenge for recognition. Because the N170 printtuning effect is specific to strings of letters and is typically not evoked by individual letters (Maurer et al, 2005b;Pernet et al, 2003), the lack of visual familiarity for pinyin strings may account for the absence of left-lateralized N170 responses for pinyin in both Chinese and Dutch participants.…”
Section: Print Tuning To Phonetic Pinyin Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%