2020
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2020.2963954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Stance Detection With Hierarchical Linguistic Representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order not to miss the denier attitude of a single tweet that could interfere with the implementation of climate change policies, we focus on detecting statementlevel stance detection, where the goal is to predict the stance described in a single tweet. The stance detection of tweets has been studied in a variety of work on the popular SemEVAL 2016 dataset, which includes the 5 targets including climate change (with 364 climate change tweets) (Vychegzhanin and Kotelnikov 2021;Wang et al 2020). However, in these previous studies, little attention was paid to understanding the characteristics of climate change denier and believer tweets in particular (only 29 climate change denier tweets in the SemEVAL 2016 dataset).…”
Section: Stance Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order not to miss the denier attitude of a single tweet that could interfere with the implementation of climate change policies, we focus on detecting statementlevel stance detection, where the goal is to predict the stance described in a single tweet. The stance detection of tweets has been studied in a variety of work on the popular SemEVAL 2016 dataset, which includes the 5 targets including climate change (with 364 climate change tweets) (Vychegzhanin and Kotelnikov 2021;Wang et al 2020). However, in these previous studies, little attention was paid to understanding the characteristics of climate change denier and believer tweets in particular (only 29 climate change denier tweets in the SemEVAL 2016 dataset).…”
Section: Stance Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the works on stance recognition have emphasized the importance of sentiment (Wang et al 2020), while some have cited the orthogonal relationship between stance and sentiment of the statement (Sen, Flöck, and Wagner 2020). However, several works have focused on the sentimental aspects of climate change conversations and justified their role in climate change (Cody et al 2015;Jiang et al 2017).…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of neural network model is found to be better than LSTM-RNN while considering long-term dependency. Zhongqing Wang et al [41] proposed the Hierarchical Attention Model in 2020 using Linguistic Attention based on argument representation, dependency representation and sentiment representation to extract meaningful words.…”
Section: B Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a multi-task Attention-based model proposed in [15], which trains Attention besides feeding important sentiment words and applying this model for train and use on Stance-based Target. Another architecture proposed in [16] is a hierarchical model that contains Hierarchical Attention layers and one Attention layer above all of them. This model uses and weights outputs of NLP modules such as sentiment analysis, dependency parsing, and agreement in the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%