1983
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.03-01-00189.1983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural projections from nucleus accumbens to globus pallidus, substantia innominata, and lateral preoptic-lateral hypothalamic area: an anatomical and electrophysiological investigation in the rat

Abstract: The anatomical organization and electrophysiological characteristics of a projection from the nucleus accumbens to anteroventral parts of the globus pallidus and to a subpallidal region that includes the substantia innominata (SI), the lateral preoptic area (LPO), and anterior parts of the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) were investigated in the rat. Autoradiographic experiments, with injections of 3H-proline into different sites in the nucleus accumbens and adjacent caudoputamen, indicate that the descending … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
118
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in contrast to the significant motor impairment evident following intraaccumbens administration of LY379268, suggesting dissociation between global glutamatergic pathways or neural circuits that may be affected following systemically and those specifically altered following intra-accumbens administration of the mGlu2/3 receptor agonist. In addition, this differential sensitivity to the motor impairment following systemic and local administration of LY379268 and that of the nucleus accumbens and the amygdala may be attributable to reduced activity from nucleus accumbens efferent projections to the globus pallidus, a key neuroanatomical structure for coordinated locomotor function (Mogenson et al, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in contrast to the significant motor impairment evident following intraaccumbens administration of LY379268, suggesting dissociation between global glutamatergic pathways or neural circuits that may be affected following systemically and those specifically altered following intra-accumbens administration of the mGlu2/3 receptor agonist. In addition, this differential sensitivity to the motor impairment following systemic and local administration of LY379268 and that of the nucleus accumbens and the amygdala may be attributable to reduced activity from nucleus accumbens efferent projections to the globus pallidus, a key neuroanatomical structure for coordinated locomotor function (Mogenson et al, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is the mediodorsal nuclei of the thalamus, which projects to both structures (Berendse and Groenewegen, 1990), and which is necessary for some reward-related behavior adaptations (Block et al, 2007). Another possible route is through the midbrain dopamine centers, which receive projections from the nucleus accumbens (via the globus pallidus) and project back to medial frontal cortex (Powell and Leman, 1976;Mogenson et al, 1983;Haber and McFarland, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the temporal profiles of dopamine release and motor activation are dissociated Kretschmer, 2000) and, more importantly, NMDA antagonists produce hyperlocomotion after lesions of dopamine pathways to the NAc (Carlsson and Carlsson, 1989). Considering the profound stimulatory effect of NMDA antagonists on PFC activity in rats (Moghaddam et al, 1997) and humans (Lahti et al, 1995), and the fact that PFC glutamatergic efferents directly innervate regions such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA) that are connected to motor effector sites (Mogensen et al, 1983;Sesack et al, 1989;Groenewegen and Uylings, 2000), we hypothesized that NMDA antagonist-induced increase in PFC activity, in addition to producing the cognitive abnormalities, also underlies the motoric effects of these drugs, independent of NAc dopamine activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%