“…Therefore, at this level of description, one might consider the group difference to reflect a distinction in terms of social orientation~Dawson, Meltzoff, Osterling, Rinaldi, & Brown, 1998;Mundy & Neal, 2001!. Third, it is not clear whether the results reflect something enduring about individual differences among participants, something about the connection between their pattern of engagement in this particular setting and their imitative performance, or some mixture of the two. For instance, one can imagine that on a given day an individual of either group might feel less than usually inclined to become involved with the tester, and for this reason deploy his or her attention to the objects of the task and as a result fail to imitate self-0other orientation.…”