2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network enhanced hybrid quantum many-body dynamical distributions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we conclude that the quantum oscillator model can reproduce the predictions of the neural network model provided that the outputs of the single and double parabolic potential well oscillators are combined together, which can be achieved, for example, by coupling them into a chain oscillator. While the discussion of an implementation of this approach is beyond the scope of this paper, the similarity of the outputs of the neural network model and the quantum oscillator model has a clear physical meaning: both models are dynamical systems that operate according to the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics [99][100][101].…”
Section: Neural Network Model Versus Quantum Oscillator Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we conclude that the quantum oscillator model can reproduce the predictions of the neural network model provided that the outputs of the single and double parabolic potential well oscillators are combined together, which can be achieved, for example, by coupling them into a chain oscillator. While the discussion of an implementation of this approach is beyond the scope of this paper, the similarity of the outputs of the neural network model and the quantum oscillator model has a clear physical meaning: both models are dynamical systems that operate according to the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics [99][100][101].…”
Section: Neural Network Model Versus Quantum Oscillator Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides being proposed as ground state estimators for variational calculations [44,[47][48][49], their representation power has been instrumental to a number of other applications, such as the calculation of spectral functions [50][51][52].…”
Section: Restricted Boltzmann Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spectral function corresponds to the dynamical spin structure factor for a spin system and the electronic many-body density of states for an electronic system. The dynamical correlator is computed using the tensor-network kernel polynomial algorithm [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. The many-body states and Hamiltonians are represented in terms of a tensor-network, using the matrix-product state formalism [51][52][53], the ground state is computed with the density-matrix renormalization group algorithm [4], and the Hamiltonian is scaled to the interval (−1, 1) to perform the Chebyshev expansion [43].…”
Section: B Dynamical Correlators With Tensor-networkmentioning
confidence: 99%