2019
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aaf29e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network decoder for topological color codes with circuit level noise

Abstract: A quantum computer needs the assistance of a classical algorithm to detect and identify errors that affect encoded quantum information. At this interface of classical and quantum computing the technique of machine learning has appeared as a way to tailor such an algorithm to the specific error processes of an experiment-without the need for a priori knowledge of the error model. Here, we apply this technique to topological color codes. We demonstrate that a recurrent neural network with long short-term memory … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We point out that in [36], information from flag qubit measurement outcomes were used in a neural network decoder to decode topological color codes resulting in improved thresholds. However the scheme is not scalable as it requires an exponential increase in training data as a function of the code distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that in [36], information from flag qubit measurement outcomes were used in a neural network decoder to decode topological color codes resulting in improved thresholds. However the scheme is not scalable as it requires an exponential increase in training data as a function of the code distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we use this strategy for the decoding of quantum LDPC codes. Neural-networkbased decoders for quantum error-correcting codes have attracted great interest recently, particularly in the context of topological codes [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. But near optimal (or very fast suboptimal) decoding algorithms are already proposed for these codes [28][29][30][31], which exploit their regular lattice structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we briefly compare our framework to existing neural decoders for topological codes. One of the common approaches that neural decoders use involves training a neural network to correct failures of a given decoder [18,33,34]. Note that when the decoding algorithm produces a recovery operator R( s) on error E corresponding to the error syndrome s, applying the recovery operation on the error is equivalent to applying a logical operator L( s) to the stabilizers G( s) of the original code state [9,10].…”
Section: F Comparison To Neural Decodersmentioning
confidence: 99%