Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1995
DOI: 10.2514/3.21542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural-network-based scheme for sensor failure detection, identification, and accommodation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple-model architectures enjoy several advantages [21], such as the fast adaptation, compared with indirect adaptive control (see [22][23][24], and references therein), when the plant dynamics change abruptly (for instance, because of failures), and the ability to provide high levels of performance for different classes of dynamic models. Furthermore, multiple-model approaches have a design modularity that makes them suitable for a number of applications, while being able to provide a natural accommodation of faults.…”
Section: Set-valued Observer-based Fault-tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple-model architectures enjoy several advantages [21], such as the fast adaptation, compared with indirect adaptive control (see [22][23][24], and references therein), when the plant dynamics change abruptly (for instance, because of failures), and the ability to provide high levels of performance for different classes of dynamic models. Furthermore, multiple-model approaches have a design modularity that makes them suitable for a number of applications, while being able to provide a natural accommodation of faults.…”
Section: Set-valued Observer-based Fault-tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter-based methods include observers [3], unknown input observers [4], Kalman filters [5], particle filters [6], sliding mode observers [7], II~, filters [8], and set membership filters [9]. There are also methods based on computer intelligence [10] that include fuzzy logic [11], neural networks [12], genetic algorithms [13], and expert systems [14]. Other methods include those based on Markov models [15], system identification [16], wavelets [17], Bayesian inference [18], control input manipulation [19], and the parity space approach [20].…”
Section: Cardinality Of Yimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we are not considering whether or not the SSRs exceed their threshold; we are only considering how large the SSRs are relative to their thresholds. The marginal detection rate is given as (12) where (13) If Y'1 is empty, aud Y j is not empty, then (14) If Y J is empty, aud Y'1 is not empty, then (15) Proof Equation (12) cau be obtained using Lemmas 5, and 6, which are in the Appendix. Equations (14), aud (15) follow from (11).…”
Section: B Correct Fault Classification Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case study chosen for this work is the Sensor Failure Detection, Identification, and Accommodation (SFDIA) flight control scheme [6,7]. The SFDIA scheme is part of an advanced flight control system that uses analytical instead of a physical redundancy to achieve faulttolerance.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%