2017
DOI: 10.1177/0959651817731976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network–based adaptive composite dynamic surface control for electro-hydraulic system with very low velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the idea of DSC, 16,19 a new state variable b 1 with a time constant t 1 is introduced to avoid repeatedly differentiating the virtual control a 1 in the next procedure, and let a 1 pass through a first-order filter (equation ( 17)). Then, the filter error (equation ( 18)) is defined…”
Section: Event-triggered Mechanism Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the idea of DSC, 16,19 a new state variable b 1 with a time constant t 1 is introduced to avoid repeatedly differentiating the virtual control a 1 in the next procedure, and let a 1 pass through a first-order filter (equation ( 17)). Then, the filter error (equation ( 18)) is defined…”
Section: Event-triggered Mechanism Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of inherent nonlinearity, dynamic changes and external uncertainties of the system. In the same year, in [50] an adaptive compound dynamic surface control strategy based on neural network for low-speed and high-accuracy tracking control of electro-hydraulic shaking table system in response to the problem of poor control of the shaking table due to nonlinearity is proposed. In addition, in [51] neural networks is used to solve the time lag problem of the vibration table substructure test system.…”
Section: Neural Network Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence methods such as c-regression model algorithm and RBF neural network were also presented to estimate unknown parameters and realize dynamic prognosis of the system. 26,27 Some research has used the composite adaptive control (CAC) to improve the controller performance, 28,29 and the CAC method combined with other control strategies have also been presented recently. 30,31 The prediction error in the CAC is usually defined as ϵ = φ θ ~ , where φ is exciting signal vector and θ ~ is estimation error vector, usually using the instantaneous data to update the adaptive law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%