2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network and support vector machine for the prediction of chronic kidney disease: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With this in mind, several studies has been conducted to increase the sensitivity and specificity by proposing better classification characterized algorithms to reduce the misclassification. Some of them are successfully producing higher sensitivity and specificity algorithms, especially algorithms that related to ASD classification and other medical fields [11][12][13][14][15]. Previous studies conducted by Komisicky et al [11], autistic detection using SVM, Naïve Bayes, decision tree variants, RF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With this in mind, several studies has been conducted to increase the sensitivity and specificity by proposing better classification characterized algorithms to reduce the misclassification. Some of them are successfully producing higher sensitivity and specificity algorithms, especially algorithms that related to ASD classification and other medical fields [11][12][13][14][15]. Previous studies conducted by Komisicky et al [11], autistic detection using SVM, Naïve Bayes, decision tree variants, RF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other medical fields, in the study [14] which classified chronic kidney disease using SVM and ANN. The higher levels of sensitivity are generated by ANN than SVM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, Almansour et al compared the ANN and SVM techniques in a dataset of 400 patients to predict CKD in early stage. The empirical results from the experiments indicated that ANN performed better than SVM, with accuracies of 99.75% and 97.75%, respectively [26]. Chen Z et al also used multivariate models, i.e., K-nearest neighbor (KNN), SVM, and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA), to evaluate risk of 386 patients to predict CKD.…”
Section: Alerting Akimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a complete process of filling in the missing values is not described in detail, and no feature selection technology is used to select predictors as well. Almansour et al used SVM and neural network to diagnose CKD, and the accuracy of the models was 97.75% and 99.75%, respectively [30]. In the models established by Gunarathne et al, zero was used to fill out the missing values and decision forest achieved the best performance with the accuracy was 99.1% [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%