2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1684(01)00185-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural methods for antenna array signal processing: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural network approaches have been successfully applied to real-time beamforming (Du et al 2002). Since the robust LCMP problem (70) is a complex valued one, it is first necessary to convert it into a real valued optimization …”
Section: Neural Network Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural network approaches have been successfully applied to real-time beamforming (Du et al 2002). Since the robust LCMP problem (70) is a complex valued one, it is first necessary to convert it into a real valued optimization …”
Section: Neural Network Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of studies are done on performance comparison of ANNs for a range of applications [19,21,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. The performance of the proposed models is compared on the basis of two different measures that is, (1) mean absolute error (MAE), which gives the quality of training the model.…”
Section: General Regression Neural Network Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TDFN and ADALINE network [11][12][13] use tapped delay line to perform temporal processing. Both neural network structures are used to predict the next value of the spatial signature vector as the downlink weight vector.…”
Section: Neural Network Modelingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of present work is to predict downlink weight vectors via time delay feedforward neural network (TDFN) modeling, adaptive linear neuron (ADALINE) network modeling [9][10][11][12], and autoregressive (AR) modeling of uplink spatial signature vectors. We compare the performance of these models under varying mobile speed (V) and prediction filter (delay) order (P).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%