2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine &Amp; Biology Society (EMBC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9175641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Memory Networks for Seizure Type Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we compare our model's performance to results of two other CNNs reported in the literature 35,36 . Following standards established by recent studies on seizure detection 24,28,29 and seizure type classification 33,35,37 , we compare the AUROC scores on the test set between the baselines and our DCRNN models for seizure detection, and weighted F1-scores for seizure type classification. As a fair comparison to the CNN-based ensemble model SeizureNet 35 , we trained and evaluated our DCRNN using a new train and test split: the same 3-fold patient-wise split reported by Asif et al 35 .…”
Section: Graph Neural Network Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we compare our model's performance to results of two other CNNs reported in the literature 35,36 . Following standards established by recent studies on seizure detection 24,28,29 and seizure type classification 33,35,37 , we compare the AUROC scores on the test set between the baselines and our DCRNN models for seizure detection, and weighted F1-scores for seizure type classification. As a fair comparison to the CNN-based ensemble model SeizureNet 35 , we trained and evaluated our DCRNN using a new train and test split: the same 3-fold patient-wise split reported by Asif et al 35 .…”
Section: Graph Neural Network Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon the results so far [32][33][34][35][36] , the seizure type classification problem appears to be substantially more difficult than seizure detection alone. Investigators have used classical machine learning methods 32,33 , deep-learning-based CNNs [34][35][36] , or hybrid CNN-RNN models 37 . In most of these prior studies on seizure detection or seizure type classification, the same patients' EEGs were used for both training and evaluating the algorithms, which does not demonstrate the model's ability to generalize to unseen patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in [1] the authors couple an NMN together with neural plasticity framework to effectively identify tumors in MRI scans and abnormalities in EEGs. Furthermore, in [51] the same architecture is used to identify different seizure types in EEGs.…”
Section: G D Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For seizure type classification experiments, we exclude only myoclonic seizures because of the small number of seizures recorded (three seizure events). The seven types of seizure selected for analysis are focal non-specific seizures (FNSZ), generalized non-specific seizures (GNSZ), simple partial seizures (SPSZ), complex partial seizures (CPSZ), absence seizures (ABSZ), tonic seizures (TNSZ), and tonic clonic seizures (TCSZ) [30]. Clinically SPSZ and CPSZ are more specific subclasses of FNSZ, while ABSZ, TNSZ, and TCSZ are more specific subclasses of GNSZ.…”
Section: B Experimental Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%