2005
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00816.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Mechanisms of Stimulus Velocity Tuning in the Superior Colliculus

Abstract: Superior colliculus (SC)-mediated control of visuomotor behavior depends on neuronal selectivity for stimulus velocity. However, the mechanism responsible for velocity tuning in SC neurons is unclear. It was shown in a previous study of anesthetized, decorticate hamsters that the number and distribution of feed-forward retinal inputs are not critical for velocity tuning. Here the alternate hypothesis that inhibition from the surround determines velocity tuning of SC neurons was tested. Surround inhibition was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(73 reference statements)
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not clear how these mechanisms can explain selectivity for fast velocities. However, in the visual layers of the superior colliculus, it has been suggested that a delayed inhibition from the RF surround may suppress responses to slow moving stimuli, but allow responses to fast moving stimuli (Razak and Pallas 2005). This is similar to observations in the pallid bat IC and cortex.…”
Section: Comparison Of Rate and Direction Selectivity Mechanisms In Vsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It is not clear how these mechanisms can explain selectivity for fast velocities. However, in the visual layers of the superior colliculus, it has been suggested that a delayed inhibition from the RF surround may suppress responses to slow moving stimuli, but allow responses to fast moving stimuli (Razak and Pallas 2005). This is similar to observations in the pallid bat IC and cortex.…”
Section: Comparison Of Rate and Direction Selectivity Mechanisms In Vsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, analogous to results with time expansion of consonants in audition, thresholds for detecting visual motion speed improve with increasing stimulus duration to a larger extent in older participants (Raghuram et al 2005). Similar receptive field mechanisms have been proposed to underlie FM rate selectivity and motion speed selectivity in auditory Fuzessery 2008, 2009;Trujillo et al 2013) and visual (Duysens et al 1985;Razak and Pallas 2005) systems, respectively. The similar deficits observed in the respective areas with aging are suggestive of similar underlying causes.…”
Section: Comparison Of Age-related Decline In Sensory Processing Acrosupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Taken together, these studies suggest that there are at least three different mechanisms shaping FM sweep selectivity in the auditory system. In the mammalian visual system, similar mechanisms have been shown to shape movement direction and velocity selectivity (Goodwin and Henry, 1978; Movshon et al, 1978; Patel and Sillito, 1978; Duysens et al, 1985a,b; Jagadeesh et al, 1993; Livingstone, 1998; Murthy and Humphrey, 1999; Fried et al, 2005; Razak and Pallas, 2005). The difference appears to be in the relative extent to which each of these mechanisms contribute to selectivity in the different sensory systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, asymmetric sideband inhibition gives rise to direction and rate (velocity) selectivity in both visual (Goodwin and Henry, 1978; Patel and Sillito, 1978; Fried et al, 2005; Razak and Pallas, 2005) and auditory systems (Suga, 1965; Zhang et al, 2003; Fuzessery et al, 2006; Razak and Fuzessery, 2006). Similarly, selectivity for the duration a stimulus spends within the excitatory receptive field gives rise to rate selectivity in both the visual (Duysens et al, 1985a; 1985b) and auditory system (Fuzessery et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%