1975
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural implications of different profiles between treadmill and overground locomotion timings in cats

Abstract: A cinematographic comparison of treadmill and overground performances by the cat revealed considerable flexibility in the neural control program for locomotion. For the single limb's step cycle, swing duration (time foot is off the surface) was approximately equal in both situations, as has been found previously. Subcomponents of the swing (flexion duration and timings between joints during the transition from flexion to extension) differed, however. Interlimb timings also responded to situation. The interval … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of these high velocities is brief, however, falling within the period of blinks observed in this study and reported for other monkey (Macaca) species (Baker et al, 2002;Porter et al, 1993). Other studies comparing treadmill and overground locomotion in humans and quadrupeds also reveal differences, though less dramatic, in angular and linear displacements (Alton et al, 1998;Barrey et al, 1993;Nigg et al, 1995;Stolz et al, 1997;Vogt et al, 2002), as well as in temporal characteristics (e.g., Alton et al, 1998;Barrey et al, 1993;Buchner et al, 1994;Nelson et al, 1972;Stolze et al, 1997;Wetzel and Stuart, 1976;Wetzel et al, 1975) and generated forces (White et al, 1998).…”
Section: Comparison Of Head and Trunk Rotations During Treadmillsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The duration of these high velocities is brief, however, falling within the period of blinks observed in this study and reported for other monkey (Macaca) species (Baker et al, 2002;Porter et al, 1993). Other studies comparing treadmill and overground locomotion in humans and quadrupeds also reveal differences, though less dramatic, in angular and linear displacements (Alton et al, 1998;Barrey et al, 1993;Nigg et al, 1995;Stolz et al, 1997;Vogt et al, 2002), as well as in temporal characteristics (e.g., Alton et al, 1998;Barrey et al, 1993;Buchner et al, 1994;Nelson et al, 1972;Stolze et al, 1997;Wetzel and Stuart, 1976;Wetzel et al, 1975) and generated forces (White et al, 1998).…”
Section: Comparison Of Head and Trunk Rotations During Treadmillsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…3). The discrepancy may be due to differences m the motor aspects of the two stepping modes whmh exist but have not been covered by our limited measurements (Wetzel et al 1975). There might also be differences m the sensory aspects which characterise the two modes of stepping, Influencing the hlppocampal EEG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, variability in FL or HL values was frequently found to result from treadmill locomotion, especially in small mammals. Limb coordination may be influenced by a permanent adjustment of the speed of the animal to treadmill speed, as shown for various kinematic parameters in many studies (Wetzel et al, 1975;Eliot and Blanksby, 1976;Alton et al, 1993;Barrey et al, 1993;Wank et al, 1998;Dunbar, 2004;Herbin et al, 2007).…”
Section: Relationship Between Temporal and Spatial Coordination And Tmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, the pairs of limbs are not in the same position on the anteroposterior axis, translating the (Wetzel et al, 1975); spatial movement of the hind pair back a trunk length of the animal with respect to the spatial movement of the fore pair. By trunk length, we mean the distance between the shoulder and the hip -this was measured in a static posture, using marks made on the skin of the dogs from the caudal angle of the scapula to the hip (estimated by palpation).…”
Section: D Maes and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%