2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Estimates of Imagined Outcomes in the Orbitofrontal Cortex Drive Behavior and Learning

Abstract: SUMMARY Imagination, defined as the ability to interpret reality in ways that diverge from past experience, is fundamental to adaptive behavior. This can be seen at a simple level in our capacity to predict novel outcomes in new situations. The ability to anticipate outcomes never before received can also influence learning if those imagined outcomes are not received. The orbitofrontal cortex is a key candidate for where the process of imagining likely outcomes occurs; however its precise role in generating th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
87
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(56 reference statements)
9
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the firing of OFC neurons did not appear to correlate with errors in reward prediction and instead seemed to provide a complementary signal, anticipating expected rewards. This finding is consistent with several prior studies that have looked for and failed to see error signals in single units recorded in OFC (Kennerley, Behrens, & Wallis, 2011; McDannald et al, 2014; Takahashi et al, 2013, 2009). This study extends those prior reports by testing whether activity in OFC reflects errors in the prediction of the sensory features of the rewards, independent of value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We found that the firing of OFC neurons did not appear to correlate with errors in reward prediction and instead seemed to provide a complementary signal, anticipating expected rewards. This finding is consistent with several prior studies that have looked for and failed to see error signals in single units recorded in OFC (Kennerley, Behrens, & Wallis, 2011; McDannald et al, 2014; Takahashi et al, 2013, 2009). This study extends those prior reports by testing whether activity in OFC reflects errors in the prediction of the sensory features of the rewards, independent of value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In accordance with the aforementioned results, BOLD-activation associated with PEs incorporating inference on alternative options was reduced in the vmPFC of BED patients. In healthy individuals, concurrent tracking of multiple decision possibilities and their potential consequences contributes to flexible goal-directed behavior in dynamic environments (Abe and Lee, 2011;BrombergMartin et al, 2010;Glascher et al, 2009;Hampton et al, 2006;Lohrenz et al, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2013). In the present study, vmPFC PE signatures incorporating inference on alternative options were indeed positively associated with successful choices and negatively associated with switching behavior.…”
Section: Reduced Incorporation Of Inference On Alternative Options Insupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Previous rodent studies indicate that OFC neurons start representing the relative value of potential outcomes from the time a decision is made (Sul et al 2010;Takahashi et al 2013). Indeed, we now have preliminary evidence that neuronal activity in the OFC of rats performing the same task carried value signals at possible choice areas of the T-maze (e.g., the start arm and the junction of the 3 arms) and these signals persisted until the end of delay periods ( Jo and Mizumori, unpublished data).…”
Section: Ofc Contribution To Generating Expected Reward Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature suggests that the PFC can flexibly adjust outcome values in response to motivational or environmental changes even before experiencing the outcome (Corbit and Balleine 2003;Izquierdo et al 2004;Ostlund and Balleine 2005;Jones et al 2012;Takahashi et al 2013). Due to this characteristic of updating values independent of reward prediction errors, little attention has been paid to the possibility that the PFC may directly influence computations of DAergic error signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%