2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2105.08086
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Error Mitigation of Near-Term Quantum Simulations

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work also clearly indicates that the current gener-ation of Rydberg atom arrays can produce data of high value to physicists, even at measurement rates which may be too low to be informationally complete for a full tomographic reconstruction of the quantum state. This strategy can be combined with the recent observation that Hamiltonian-driven optimization can also be used to mitigate errors in noisy experiments [44]. This suggests that the current generation of quantum hardware is on the cusp of bringing transformative improvement to the understanding of challenging quantum many-body systems, by providing data to enhance variational simulation strategies for any state that can be prepared by an experimental quantum simulator.…”
Section: (B) Inset)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work also clearly indicates that the current gener-ation of Rydberg atom arrays can produce data of high value to physicists, even at measurement rates which may be too low to be informationally complete for a full tomographic reconstruction of the quantum state. This strategy can be combined with the recent observation that Hamiltonian-driven optimization can also be used to mitigate errors in noisy experiments [44]. This suggests that the current generation of quantum hardware is on the cusp of bringing transformative improvement to the understanding of challenging quantum many-body systems, by providing data to enhance variational simulation strategies for any state that can be prepared by an experimental quantum simulator.…”
Section: (B) Inset)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we leverage these unique features of neural network wavefunctions to explore the effect of combined data-and Hamiltonian-driven learning [44]. Beginning with a randomly initialized recurrent neural network (RNN) [18], we first optimize network parameters using a limited amount of simulated [12,14,45] Rydberg occupation data drawn from a two-dimensional array in the vicinity of a quantum phase transition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two observations are in order. On the one hand, it would seem cautious to expect that standard ML techniques will not be able by themselves to compensate for hardware noise, unless specifically designed for this purpose [73][74][75] : as a result, a minimal well posed target is to show trainability of an MLP up to an overall model error -with respect to noiseless exact values -matching as close as possible the characteristic inaccuracy induced by noise on the training points. On the other hand, one should also keep in mind that fast technological advancements, possibly in combination with error mitigation techniques 64,[76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84] , will progressively reduce the impact of hardware noise.…”
Section: Hardware Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remarkable success of variational states in the description of quantum spin systems unfortunately does not have a parallel in correlated systems of fermions, however. It is known, for example, that the natural mean-field analogue of direct-product states, the so-called Slater determinant (SD) states, fail to even qualitatively describe the thermodynamic limit of Fermi-Hubbard type Hamiltonians 3 and the development of systematically improvable neural-network-based trial wave functions is currently an active field of research both in second quantization [6][7][8] , and first quantization [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . In the latter approach, the wave function amplitudes must be anti-symmetric functions of the particle configurations, while being able to capture correlations beyond the singleparticle Slater determinants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%