2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.07.190132
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural effects of propofol-induced unconsciousness and its reversal using thalamic stimulation

Abstract: AbstractThe specific circuit mechanisms through which anesthetics induce unconsciousness have not been completely characterized. We recorded neural activity from the frontal, parietal, and temporal cortices and thalamus while maintaining unconsciousness in non-human primates (NHPs) with the anesthetic propofol. Unconsciousness was marked by slow frequency (~1 Hz) oscillations in local field potentials, entrainment of local spiking to Up states alternating with Down states of li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, we used this DBS method to increase consciousness in anesthetized macaques in a frequency-dependent manner that was CL-selective and maximally effective at 50Hz (Redinbaugh et al, 2020). This result contrasts with another recent study achieving similar arousing effects using more traditional methodology, but at a much higher stimulation frequency (150Hz) and current (1.0-2.0mA vs our 200 μ A) (Bastos et al, 2021). These discrepancies could imply a fundamental difference in mechanism between the DBS methods.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, we used this DBS method to increase consciousness in anesthetized macaques in a frequency-dependent manner that was CL-selective and maximally effective at 50Hz (Redinbaugh et al, 2020). This result contrasts with another recent study achieving similar arousing effects using more traditional methodology, but at a much higher stimulation frequency (150Hz) and current (1.0-2.0mA vs our 200 μ A) (Bastos et al, 2021). These discrepancies could imply a fundamental difference in mechanism between the DBS methods.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…(1.0-2.0mA vs our 200μA) (Bastos et al, 2021). These discrepancies could imply a fundamental difference in mechanism between the DBS methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the historical dichotomy between the cortex as the substrate of contents of consciousness and the thalamus and brainstem as substrates of arousal has oversimplified the various and diverse roles of subcortical systems [96]. As a first step, efforts should be directed toward a detailed mapping of how key subcortical structures (e.g., thalamus, brainstem nuclei, and basal ganglia) interact with specific cortical layers by using high-field structural and functional neuroimaging and complementary animal models [97,98]. A relevant example of how current oversimplified views of the subcortical-cortical interplay can be refined into region-and lamina-specific accounts is provided by Redinbaugh et al [97], who used thalamic stimulation in the anesthetized macaque to reveal that consciousness-relevant thalamic influence differs between deep and superficial cortical layers.…”
Section: Linking Micro-and Macroscalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10). We anticipate more detailed pairwise relationships between units can be identified in future studies without these confounds [68][69][70] or using further analytical techniques accounting for the specific effects of anesthesia [71][72][73] .…”
Section: Timing and Interactions Among Single Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%