2020
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0142-20.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Differentiation is Moderated by Age in Scene-Selective, But Not Face-Selective, Cortical Regions

Abstract: The aging brain is characterized by neural dedifferentiation, an apparent decrease in the functional selectivity of category-selective cortical regions. Age-related reductions in neural differentiation have been proposed to play a causal role in cognitive aging. Recent findings suggest, however, that age-related dedifferentiation is not equally evident for all stimulus categories and, additionally, that the relationship between neural differentiation and cognitive performance is not moderated by age. In light … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…'Reinstatement indices' based on the resulting single-trial β-weights in each sceneselective ROI, separately for the trials of the two retrieval tasks, were computed in a manner akin to a previously described 'differentiation index' Srokova et al, 2020;Voss et al, 2008;Zebrowitz et al, 2016). The reinstatement index operationalizes retrieval-related reinstatement of scene information in terms of an effect size by computing the difference between the mean BOLD response associated with test words studied over scene backgrounds versus words studied over scrambled backgrounds, and then dividing the difference by pooled standard deviation:…”
Section: Univariate Reinstatement Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…'Reinstatement indices' based on the resulting single-trial β-weights in each sceneselective ROI, separately for the trials of the two retrieval tasks, were computed in a manner akin to a previously described 'differentiation index' Srokova et al, 2020;Voss et al, 2008;Zebrowitz et al, 2016). The reinstatement index operationalizes retrieval-related reinstatement of scene information in terms of an effect size by computing the difference between the mean BOLD response associated with test words studied over scene backgrounds versus words studied over scrambled backgrounds, and then dividing the difference by pooled standard deviation:…”
Section: Univariate Reinstatement Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pattern similarity analysis (PSA) was performed to complement the analyses of the univariate reinstatement index (cf. Srokova et al, 2020). Scene reinstatement was operationalized in terms of shared neural patterns between test trials and a scene-specific voxel-wise profile derived from the functional localizer.…”
Section: Pattern Similarity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral performance and neuropsychological test performance have been reported previously (Srokova et al, 2020; Hill et al, 2021) and are only briefly summarized below. With regards to neuropsychological test performance, younger adults outperformed older adults on the CVLT Short Delay – Free recall, CVLT recognition – False alarms, WMS Logical Memory I and II, SDMT, Trails A and B, and Raven’s matrices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the visual condition, we chose to present faces and spatial scenes, motivated by work on face-selective and scene-selective brain regions (Kanwisher et al, 1997 ; Epstein and Kanwisher, 1998 ; Gazzaley et al, 2005 ; Collins and Dickerson, 2019 ). Further, those stimuli seemed to show differences in age-related reductions in neural dedifferentiation, which makes them interesting for longitudinal studies (Srokova et al, 2020 ). To select auditory stimuli on a similar level of specificity, we chose voice and environmental stimuli motivated by previous work on voice-selective brain regions (Belin et al, 2000 , 2002 ; Pernet et al, 2015 ; Agus et al, 2017 ; Zäske et al, 2017 ; Aglieri et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%