2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2614-09.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Correlates of Value, Risk, and Risk Aversion Contributing to Decision Making under Risk

Abstract: Decision making under risk is central to human behavior. Economic decision theory suggests that value, risk, and risk aversion influence choice behavior. Although previous studies identified neural correlates of decision parameters, the contribution of these correlates to actual choices is unknown. In two different experiments, participants chose between risky and safe options. We identified discrete blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) correlates of value and risk in the ventral striatum and anterior cingulate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
323
5
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(72 reference statements)
27
323
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is supported by a number of prior studies, including our own (Clark et al, 2012) which found greater BOLD fMRI responses in right inferior frontal cortex evoked by occluded target objects indicating possible threats when contrasted with stimuli without target objects, suggesting that this brain region was a part of a network associated with the detection of threatening target objects. Additional studies have found that these regions are also involved in the perception of risk associated with decision making (Christopoulos, Tobler, Bossaerts, Dolan, & Schultz, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is supported by a number of prior studies, including our own (Clark et al, 2012) which found greater BOLD fMRI responses in right inferior frontal cortex evoked by occluded target objects indicating possible threats when contrasted with stimuli without target objects, suggesting that this brain region was a part of a network associated with the detection of threatening target objects. Additional studies have found that these regions are also involved in the perception of risk associated with decision making (Christopoulos, Tobler, Bossaerts, Dolan, & Schultz, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the introduction, we considered four alternatives of how risk attitudes may manifest themselves in mental functions and their physiological correlates (negative linear, positive linear, curvilinear and flat relation). For hemodynamic fMRI responses, we have previously found response increases with risk but a flat relation with risk attitude in the middle cingulate cortex (Burke and Tobler, 2011;Christopoulos et al, 2009) and posterior parts of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (Tobler et al, 2007).…”
Section: Relation Of Eda and Risk Attitudementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cingulate regions are known to mediate integration and evaluation of emotional, motivational and cognitive information, and to modulate attention (Bishop et al, 2004;Vogt, 2005) with direct connections to amygdala, thalamus, prefrontal and insular areas and to the posterior parietal lobe (Goldman-Rakic, 1988). Cingulate activity in risk tasks was associated with a higher probability of a risky choice (Christopoulos et al, 2009) and was increased when risky choices involved immediate losses (Xu et al, 2009). Activation within the PCC was suggested to signal the subjective preferences that guide visual orienting within a gambling task comprising risky choices (McCoy and Platt, 2005).…”
Section: Anatomical and Functional Features Of The Brain Regions Invomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presented stimuli or terms had to be assessed in relation to a personal risk for the subject, or decision making was investigated under risky conditions with reward or loss for the subject (overview in Mohr et al, 2010a, e.g. Bach et al, 2009Christopoulos et al, 2009;Huettel, 2006;Preuschoff et al, 2006;Quartz, 2009;Smith et al, 2009;Vorhold et al, 2007;Xu et al, 2009, and others). This meant also a direct emotional impact of the risk-related stimulus to the subjects: a possibly immediate negative consequence as fear or enjoying a positive outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%