Abstract:Certain individuals during deep meditative state can give out an aura or 'light, which is perceived by others through some unknown connections, visual, telepathic or other. Despite various anecdotal, historical accounts of such induced light experience (ILE), its underlying neural mechanisms are not known. In this pilot study, we investigated the neural correlates of ILE by simultaneously recording the EEGs of an expert meditation Teacher, who is claimed to elicit ILE, and his Pupil (N=2) during joint meditati… Show more
“…Setting. A majority of studies (25/28, 89%) were conducted in the lab while 11% (3/28) of the studies were done in a natural setting [23,87,90]. For example, Babiloni et al [87] demonstrated that the EEG methodology is suitable for high-quality EEG data in subjects playing in an ensemble outside of a lab.…”
Section: Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Babiloni et al [87] demonstrated that the EEG methodology is suitable for high-quality EEG data in subjects playing in an ensemble outside of a lab. Recently, Fenwick et al [90] was the first study to investigate neural synchrony during meditation.…”
The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive review on hyperscanning research (measuring brain activity simultaneously from more than two people interacting) using an explicit systematic method, the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Data were searched from IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Engineering Village, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were journal articles written in English from 2000 to 19 June 2019. A total of 126 empirical studies were screened out to address three specific questions regarding the neuroimaging method, the application domain, and the experiment paradigm. Results showed that the most used neuroimaging method with hyperscanning was magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography (MEG/EEG; 47%), and the least used neuroimaging method was hyper-transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) (1%). Applications in cognition accounted for almost half the studies (48%), while educational applications accounted for less than 5% of the studies. Applications in decision-making tasks were the second most common (26%), shortly followed by applications in motor synchronization (23%). The findings from this systematic review that were based on documented, transparent and reproducible searches should help build cumulative knowledge and guide future research regarding inter-brain neural synchrony during social interactions, that is, hyperscanning research.
“…Setting. A majority of studies (25/28, 89%) were conducted in the lab while 11% (3/28) of the studies were done in a natural setting [23,87,90]. For example, Babiloni et al [87] demonstrated that the EEG methodology is suitable for high-quality EEG data in subjects playing in an ensemble outside of a lab.…”
Section: Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Babiloni et al [87] demonstrated that the EEG methodology is suitable for high-quality EEG data in subjects playing in an ensemble outside of a lab. Recently, Fenwick et al [90] was the first study to investigate neural synchrony during meditation.…”
The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive review on hyperscanning research (measuring brain activity simultaneously from more than two people interacting) using an explicit systematic method, the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Data were searched from IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Engineering Village, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were journal articles written in English from 2000 to 19 June 2019. A total of 126 empirical studies were screened out to address three specific questions regarding the neuroimaging method, the application domain, and the experiment paradigm. Results showed that the most used neuroimaging method with hyperscanning was magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography (MEG/EEG; 47%), and the least used neuroimaging method was hyper-transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) (1%). Applications in cognition accounted for almost half the studies (48%), while educational applications accounted for less than 5% of the studies. Applications in decision-making tasks were the second most common (26%), shortly followed by applications in motor synchronization (23%). The findings from this systematic review that were based on documented, transparent and reproducible searches should help build cumulative knowledge and guide future research regarding inter-brain neural synchrony during social interactions, that is, hyperscanning research.
“…The following studies explore machine mediated neural and behavioral synchronization in real and virtual environments (Hachmeister et al, 2014 ; Gumilar et al, 2021 ). Similarly, the effect of cooperation on neural synchrony (Abe et al, 2019 ), meditation and monastic debates (Fenwick et al, 2019 ; van Vugt et al, 2020 ), emotional association in groups (Nummenmaa et al, 2014 ; Goldstein et al, 2018 ; Santamaria et al, 2019 ) are included in this paradigm. These studies do not have a single set of specified roles for the participants similar to the previous paradigm apart from the participants all being part of social groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that put no restrictions on the participants regarding movement and used wireless or comparatively lighter data acquisition device was considered naturalistic and comprised 59.3% or 38/64 of the papers (Reiterer et al, 2011 ; Ding et al, 2018 ; Greco et al, 2018 ). Some studies restricted the movement of the participants (Dikker et al, 2017 ; Bevilacqua et al, 2019 ) through instructions, monitored ambient lighting (Fenwick et al, 2019 ), used noise-canceling earphones (Balconi, 2016 ) to limit perceived noise. These were considered semi-naturalistic as they do not replicate real-life social interactions on a full scale.…”
The study of brain-to-brain synchrony has a burgeoning application in the brain-computer interface (BCI) research, offering valuable insights into the neural underpinnings of interacting human brains using numerous neural recording technologies. The area allows exploring the commonality of brain dynamics by evaluating the neural synchronization among a group of people performing a specified task. The growing number of publications on brain-to-brain synchrony inspired the authors to conduct a systematic review using the PRISMA protocol so that future researchers can get a comprehensive understanding of the paradigms, methodologies, translational algorithms, and challenges in the area of brain-to-brain synchrony research. This review has gone through a systematic search with a specified search string and selected some articles based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. The findings from the review revealed that most of the articles have followed the social psychology paradigm, while 36% of the selected studies have an application in cognitive neuroscience. The most applied approach to determine neural connectivity is a coherence measure utilizing phase-locking value (PLV) in the EEG studies, followed by wavelet transform coherence (WTC) in all of the fNIRS studies. While most of the experiments have control experiments as a part of their setup, a small number implemented algorithmic control, and only one study had interventional or a stimulus-induced control experiment to limit spurious synchronization. Hence, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this systematic review solely contributes to critically evaluating the scopes and technological advances of brain-to-brain synchrony to allow this discipline to produce more effective research outcomes in the remote future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.