2013
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of successful semantic processing during propofol sedation

Abstract: Sedation has a graded effect on brain responses to auditory stimuli: perceptual processing persists at sedation levels that attenuate more complex processing. We used fMRI in healthy volunteers sedated with propofol to assess changes in neural responses to spoken stimuli. Volunteers were scanned awake, sedated, and during recovery, while making perceptual or semantic decisions about nonspeech sounds or spoken words respectively. Sedation caused increased error rates and response times, and differentially affec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(71 reference statements)
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with earlier observations that propofol attenuates stimulus-induced activity during auditory and noxious stimulation [Adapa et al, 2014; Davis et al, 2007; DiFrancesco et al, 2013; Dueck et al, 2005; Frölich et al, 2017; Liu et al, 2012; Mhuircheartaigh et al, 2010; Mhuircheartaigh et al, 2013]. These effects may be due to an overall impairment of hierarchy cortical processing and information integration [Alkire et al, 2008; Davis et al, 2007].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are in line with earlier observations that propofol attenuates stimulus-induced activity during auditory and noxious stimulation [Adapa et al, 2014; Davis et al, 2007; DiFrancesco et al, 2013; Dueck et al, 2005; Frölich et al, 2017; Liu et al, 2012; Mhuircheartaigh et al, 2010; Mhuircheartaigh et al, 2013]. These effects may be due to an overall impairment of hierarchy cortical processing and information integration [Alkire et al, 2008; Davis et al, 2007].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We found a gradual decease of TTM in both amplitude and spatial distribution from wakefulness (widespread brain areas) through sedation (auditory cortex, language, and sensorimotor networks) to deep anesthesia (auditory cortex only). Our results are in line with earlier observations that propofol attenuates stimulus-induced activity during auditory and noxious stimulation (Adapa, Davis, Stamatakis, Absalom, & Menon, 2014;Davis et al, 2007;DiFrancesco, Robertson, Karunanayaka, & Holland, 2013;Dueck et al, 2005;Frölich, Banks, & Ness, 2017;Liu et al, 2012;Mhuircheartaigh et al, 2010;Ní Mhuircheartaigh, Warnaby, Rogers, Jbabdi, & Tracey, 2013). These effects may be due to an overall impairment of hierarchy cortical processing and information integration (Alkire et al, 2008;Davis et al, 2007).…”
Section: Graded Attenuation Of Ttm From Wakefulness Through Sedatiosupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The full stimulus set included 120 neutral (i.e., not intrinsically salient) monosyllabic words, half describing living items (e.g., horse, tree) and half describing nonliving items (e.g., table, stone), recorded in a neutral (i.e., nonemotional) female voice. 15 From the set, 50 were randomly chosen and allocated, in subgroups of 5, to each of the 10 blocks (5 baseline, 5 target detection). Within each block, words were randomly selected to repeat 7, 6, 5, or 4 times (with 2 words repeating 4 times), resulting in 26 word presentations per block.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty five healthy volunteer subjects were recruited for scanning. The acquisition procedures are described in detail in (Stamatakis et al, 2010;Adapa et al, 2014): MRI data were acquired on a Siemens Trio 3T scanner Of the 25 healthy subjects datasets, 10 were excluded, either because of missing scans (n=2), or due of excessive motion in the scanner (n=8, 5mm maximum motion threshold). For this study, we only used the awake, control condition described in the original Stamatakis study, ignoring the drug conditions.…”
Section: Healthy Control Datamentioning
confidence: 99%