2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of serial order effect in verbal divergent thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
6
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Divergent thinking is closely related to creative abilities (Kraft, 2005;Wang et al, 2017). In a survey by Campbell et al (2015), 86.6% of fieldwork educators listed creativity as an essential professional attribute for success in a fieldwork placement, and that number rose to 95% if the fieldwork placement was in a pediatric setting.…”
Section: Therapy Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Divergent thinking is closely related to creative abilities (Kraft, 2005;Wang et al, 2017). In a survey by Campbell et al (2015), 86.6% of fieldwork educators listed creativity as an essential professional attribute for success in a fieldwork placement, and that number rose to 95% if the fieldwork placement was in a pediatric setting.…”
Section: Therapy Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergent thinking, with its ties to creativity, is needed to generate treatment ideas and solutions to clinical problems. Creativity, the process of exploring diverse possible solutions and generating original ideas through divergent thinking (Kraft, 2005;Wang et al, 2017), has been shown to be a part of everyday OT practice for both clinical reasoning and the generation of treatment activities (Schmid, 2004).…”
Section: Divergent Thinking and Occupational Therapy Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though not a perfect proxy for creativity, for over 60 years, divergent thinking tasks have commonly served as the operational definition of choice for many creativity researchers. This is becoming increasingly common in the burgeoning neuroscience literature on creativity (e.g., Benedek et al, 2014;Madore et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2017;Beaty et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018;Vartanian et al, 2018). Though some scoring methods are straightfoward (e.g., fluency), there is considerable disagreement about how to quantify "originality, " "creativity, " or "novelty, " of the responses themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%