2017
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Correlates of Selective Attention With Hearing Aid Use Followed by ReadMyQuips Auditory Training Program

Abstract: Hearing aid use was associated with a decrement in involuntary attention switch to distractors in the auditory selective attention task. RMQ training led to gains in speech perception in noise and improved listener confidence in the auditory selective attention task.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
15
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dawes et al (2014) did not find any changes in P1, N1, or P2 peaks of the cortical response after 12 weeks of hearing aid use. However, Rao et al (2017) found a significant reduction in P3a amplitude in older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss after four weeks of hearing aid use. The differing results between the two studies might be attributed to the cortical measures and methodology employed in the studies; the P3a peak was obtained through an odd ball procedure and is linked to attention; therefore, effects of amplification may be more evident when there is a direct link to cognitive resources within the methodology used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Dawes et al (2014) did not find any changes in P1, N1, or P2 peaks of the cortical response after 12 weeks of hearing aid use. However, Rao et al (2017) found a significant reduction in P3a amplitude in older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss after four weeks of hearing aid use. The differing results between the two studies might be attributed to the cortical measures and methodology employed in the studies; the P3a peak was obtained through an odd ball procedure and is linked to attention; therefore, effects of amplification may be more evident when there is a direct link to cognitive resources within the methodology used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Most likely, this was due to using only one session of training in the present study. One may speculate that by providing several sessions of auditory training when background noise is added to training materials, then auditory training becomes an active training method (i.e., more challenging due to more degradation of the speech signal, see Rao et al, 2017) that subsequently would result in better HINT performance. In their review, however, Henshaw and Ferguson (2013) evaluated the effects of auditory training on aural rehabilitation of people with hearing loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sentence recognition, however, the current research with regards to the effect of auditory training on subsequent sentence identification in noise is inconclusive. For instance, Levitt et al (2011) and Rao et al (2017), both using ReadMyQuips auditory training program, and Sweetow and Sabes (2006) and Olson et al (2013), using Listening and Communication Enhancement auditory training program, demonstrated the efficiency of auditory training on auditory sentence identification in noise, in hearing-aid users. However, Bock and Abrams (2013) and Abrams et al (2015) reported no effects of auditory training on sentence identification in noise in hearing aid users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RMQ is a computerized program designed to improve speech understanding through AV training in the presence of background noise. RMQ training has been shown to improve HA users’ speech-in-noise perception as well as confidence in target detection in auditory selective attention task (Abrams et al, 2015 ; Rao et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A topic of current interest in audiology and aging neuroscience is the benefits and neuromodulatory effects from HA use and auditory training (Pichora-Fuller and Levitt, 2012 ; Anderson et al, 2013 ; Ferguson and Henshaw, 2015 ; Morais et al, 2015 ; Rao et al, 2017 ). Electroencephalography (EEG) studies have shown mixed results at the subcortical (Philibert et al, 2005 ; Dawes et al, 2013 ) and cortical levels (Bertoli et al, 2011 ; Dawes et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%