2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
151
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
13
151
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A large body of evidence shows a prominent role for this area in social cognitive functions such as theory of mind, empathy, moral reasoning and social decision making. 28,[50][51][52] In addition, vmPFC has been strongly implicated in explicit emotion regulation, particularly when subjects utilize an egocentric strategy. 53 Aberrant serotonin signalling in medial PFC is implicated impulsive decision making, 54 and deleterious changes in reward-based decision making and social behavior, including impulsive violence, are seen following damage to vmPFC in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of evidence shows a prominent role for this area in social cognitive functions such as theory of mind, empathy, moral reasoning and social decision making. 28,[50][51][52] In addition, vmPFC has been strongly implicated in explicit emotion regulation, particularly when subjects utilize an egocentric strategy. 53 Aberrant serotonin signalling in medial PFC is implicated impulsive decision making, 54 and deleterious changes in reward-based decision making and social behavior, including impulsive violence, are seen following damage to vmPFC in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although exposure times of 2 s or even less are standard in fMRI research involving emotional stimuli and effective to activate relevant brain structures (e.g., Britton et al, 2006;Goossens et al, 2009;Hariri et al, 2002;Norris et al, 2004), may paradigms in the field of emotion regulation have employed longer picture viewing times (e.g., Beauregard et al, 2001;Kim & Hamann, 2007;Koenigsberg et al, 2010;Levesque et al, 2003;Mak et al, 2009;Ochsner et al, 2002;Ochsner, Ray et al, 2004). However, in contrast to these investigations where regulation strategies alternate on a trial-by-trial basis and hence require the search for imagespecific adjustments (e.g., re-interpretations during REAP), here we applied a blocked design where regulation could be implemented in a more sustained manner (as already used elsewhere, e.g., Harenski & Hamann, 2006;Phan et al, 2005) and was guided by controlled instructions (e.g., "pretend unreal" for the REAP strategy) for all stimulus conditions and all participants. Therefore, although precluding a modulation of longer emotional "states" (see Eryilmaz, Van De Ville, Schwartz, & Vuilleumier, 2011), our study nonetheless could focus on the selective effects of REAP and/or ESUP on stimulus-driven emotional responses and was actually capable of delineating pronounced modulations in several subcortical and limbic brain areas.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these studies focus on participants' negative evaluations of moral violations, for instance, hitting people with trolleys, breaking promises, distributing resources unfairly, and eating dead pets (Borg, Hynes, Van Horn, Grafton, & Sinnott-Armstrong, 2006;Cushman, 2008;Greene, Nystrom, Engell, Darley, & Cohen, 2004;Hauser, Cushman, Young, Jin, & Mikhail, 2007;Hsu, Anen, & Quartz, 2008). Moral judgments across these cases reflect a multitude of cognitive processes, including emotional responses to bad behavior and its effects (Harenski & Hamaan, 2006;Heekeren, Wartenburger, Schmidt, Schwintowski, & Villringer, 2003), as well as representations of the agent's mind, including his or her beliefs and intentions, i.e. "theory of mind" (ToM) (Borg, et al, 2006;Young, Cushman, Hauser, & Saxe, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%