Neural Correlates of Preference: A Transmodal Validation Study

Abstract

Liking is one of the most important psychological processes associated with the reward system, being involved in affective processing and pleasure/displeasure encoding. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the combination of physiological indicators which best predict liking, especially when applied to dynamic stimuli such as videos. There is a lack of a standard methodology to assess likeability over time and therefore in assessing narrative and semantic aspects of the stimulus. We developed a time-dependent method to evaluate the physiological correlates of likeability for three different thematic categories, namely: adventure (AV), comedy (CM), and nature landscape (LS). Twenty-eight healthy adults with ages ranging from 18 to 35 years (average: 23.85 years) were enrolled in the study. The participants were asked to provide likeability ratings for videos as they watched them, using a response box. Three 60-s videos were presented, one for each category, in randomized order while the participant’s physiological data [electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiogram (ECG) and eye tracking (ET)] was recorded. The comedy video (CM) presented the smallest minimum accumulated normalized rating (ANR; p = 0.013) and the LS video presented the highest maximum ANR (p = 0.039). The LS video presented the longest time for first response (p < 0.001) and the AV video presented the shortest time for maximum response (p = 0.016). The LS video had the highest mean likeability rating with 1.43 ± 2.31 points; and the CM video had the lowest with 0.57 ± 1.77. Multiple linear regression models were created to predict the likeability of each video using the following physiological indicators; AV: power in beta band at C4 and P4 (p = 0.004, adj. R2 = 0.301); CM: alpha power in Fp2 (p = 0.001, adj. R2 = 0.326) and LS: alpha power in P4, F8, and Fp2; beta power in C4 and P4 and pupil size, (p = 0.002, adj. R2 = 0.489). Despite its limitations (e.g., using one 1-min video per category) our findings suggest that there is a considerable difference in the psychophysiological correlates of stimuli with different contextual properties and that the use of time-dependent methods to assess videos should be considered as best practices.

The Effect of Perceived Real-Scene Environment of a River in a High-Density Urban Area on Emotions

“…The final sample achieved a balanced gender distribution. To ensure the reliability of emotional feedback pertaining to the test, the ECG data collection was conducted in a manner that eliminated the influence of individual momentary fluctuations, thereby bolstering the statistical power of the study despite the relatively small sample size [46,47]. In addition, the dynamic nature of data collection in an outdoor setting posed additional complexities compared to indoor data collection.…”

Visual preference of plant features in different living environments using eye tracking and EEG

“…When combined with other instruments, EEG can provide more accurate results for participants' response under stimulation [63,64]. Therefore, some researchers have combined eye tracking and EEG technology to discover people's preferences and physiological responses to the landscape more scientifically and effectively [51,65]. On the whole, however, the number of related studies remains small.…”

Emotion Elicitation through Vibrotactile Stimulation as an Alternative for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People: An EEG Study

“…In our daily lives, audiovisual stimuli are essential; the absence of any of these channels (visual, auditory) generates the loss of a critical part of the information. A clear example is in traditional movies, designed to be enjoyed through these two channels [2,3], or to use these channels for controlling consciousness with visually induced motion sickness [4]. Part of this information comes from the music of the film, with the consequent generation of emotions both by the music's own emotional evocation [5] and by the setting of the scene [6].…”