Abstract:Pavlovian conditioning in Hermissenda consists of pairing light, the conditioned stimulus (CS) with activation of statocyst hair cells, the unconditioned stimulus (US). Conditioning produces CS-elicited foot shortening and inhibition of light-elicited locomotion, the two conditioned responses (CRs). Conditioning correlates have been identified in the primary sensory neurons (photoreceptors) of the CS pathway, interneurons that receive monosynaptic input from identified photoreceptors, and putative pedal motor … Show more
“…Results of the present study are consistent with the hypothesis that US-evoked footshortening and US-reduced locomotion emerge independently (Matzel et al 1990). Previous research has identified intrinsic changes with Pavlovian conditioning in two cell types: photoreceptors and type I interneurons (Crow and Alkon 1980;Crow and Tian 2003b;Farley et al 1990). Neural correlates of Pavlovian conditioning-identified in the neural circuit supporting ciliary locomotion and CS-elicited inhibition of ciliary efferent neuron activity-are now well documented (Crow and Tian 2003b).…”
Section: Circuitry Supporting the Cr Complexsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Previous research has identified intrinsic changes with Pavlovian conditioning in two cell types: photoreceptors and type I interneurons (Crow and Alkon 1980;Crow and Tian 2003b;Farley et al 1990). Neural correlates of Pavlovian conditioning-identified in the neural circuit supporting ciliary locomotion and CS-elicited inhibition of ciliary efferent neuron activity-are now well documented (Crow and Tian 2003b). However, modification of the neural circuit responsible for CS-elicited foot-shortening is not documented.…”
Section: Circuitry Supporting the Cr Complexmentioning
Crow T, Tian L-M. Polysensory interneuronal projections to foot contractile pedal neurons in Hermissenda. J Neurophysiol 101: 824 -833, 2009. First published December 10, 2008 doi:10.1152/jn.91079.2008. A Pavlovian-conditioning procedure may produce modifications in multiple behavioral responses. As an example, conditioning may result in the elicitation of a specific somatomotor conditioned response (CR) and, in addition, other motor and visceral CRs. In the mollusk Hermissenda conditioning produces two conditioned responses: foot-shortening and decreased locomotion. The neural circuitry supporting ciliary locomotion is well characterized, although the neural circuit underlying foot-shortening is poorly understood. Here we describe efferent neurons in the pedal ganglion that produce contraction or extension of specific regions of the foot in semi-intact preparations. Synaptic connections between polysensory type I b and type I s interneurons and identified foot contractile efferent neurons were examined. Type I b and type I s interneurons receive synaptic input from the visual, graviceptive, and somatosensory systems. Depolarization of type I b interneurons evoked spikes in identified tail and lateral foot contractile efferent neurons. Mechanical displacement of the statocyst evoked complex excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and spikes recorded from type I b and type I s interneurons and complex EPSPs and spikes in identified foot contractile efferent neurons. Depolarization of type I b interneurons in semi-intact preparations produced contraction and shortening along the rostrocaudal axis of the foot. Depolarization of I s interneurons in semi-intact preparations produced contraction of the anterior region of the foot. Taken collectively, the results suggest that type I b and type I s polysensory interneurons may contribute to the neural circuit underlying the foot-shortening CR in Hermissenda.
“…Results of the present study are consistent with the hypothesis that US-evoked footshortening and US-reduced locomotion emerge independently (Matzel et al 1990). Previous research has identified intrinsic changes with Pavlovian conditioning in two cell types: photoreceptors and type I interneurons (Crow and Alkon 1980;Crow and Tian 2003b;Farley et al 1990). Neural correlates of Pavlovian conditioning-identified in the neural circuit supporting ciliary locomotion and CS-elicited inhibition of ciliary efferent neuron activity-are now well documented (Crow and Tian 2003b).…”
Section: Circuitry Supporting the Cr Complexsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Previous research has identified intrinsic changes with Pavlovian conditioning in two cell types: photoreceptors and type I interneurons (Crow and Alkon 1980;Crow and Tian 2003b;Farley et al 1990). Neural correlates of Pavlovian conditioning-identified in the neural circuit supporting ciliary locomotion and CS-elicited inhibition of ciliary efferent neuron activity-are now well documented (Crow and Tian 2003b). However, modification of the neural circuit responsible for CS-elicited foot-shortening is not documented.…”
Section: Circuitry Supporting the Cr Complexmentioning
Crow T, Tian L-M. Polysensory interneuronal projections to foot contractile pedal neurons in Hermissenda. J Neurophysiol 101: 824 -833, 2009. First published December 10, 2008 doi:10.1152/jn.91079.2008. A Pavlovian-conditioning procedure may produce modifications in multiple behavioral responses. As an example, conditioning may result in the elicitation of a specific somatomotor conditioned response (CR) and, in addition, other motor and visceral CRs. In the mollusk Hermissenda conditioning produces two conditioned responses: foot-shortening and decreased locomotion. The neural circuitry supporting ciliary locomotion is well characterized, although the neural circuit underlying foot-shortening is poorly understood. Here we describe efferent neurons in the pedal ganglion that produce contraction or extension of specific regions of the foot in semi-intact preparations. Synaptic connections between polysensory type I b and type I s interneurons and identified foot contractile efferent neurons were examined. Type I b and type I s interneurons receive synaptic input from the visual, graviceptive, and somatosensory systems. Depolarization of type I b interneurons evoked spikes in identified tail and lateral foot contractile efferent neurons. Mechanical displacement of the statocyst evoked complex excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and spikes recorded from type I b and type I s interneurons and complex EPSPs and spikes in identified foot contractile efferent neurons. Depolarization of type I b interneurons in semi-intact preparations produced contraction and shortening along the rostrocaudal axis of the foot. Depolarization of I s interneurons in semi-intact preparations produced contraction of the anterior region of the foot. Taken collectively, the results suggest that type I b and type I s polysensory interneurons may contribute to the neural circuit underlying the foot-shortening CR in Hermissenda.
“…In Hermissenda , Pavlovian conditioning produces intrinsic enhanced excitability in identified neurons 18–21 . Associated with conditioning‐dependent enhanced excitability is the phosphorylation of the cytoskeletal‐related protein Csp24 22,23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hermissenda, Pavlovian conditioning produces intrinsic enhanced excitability in identified neurons. [18][19][20][21] Associated with conditioning-dependent enhanced excitability is the phosphorylation of the cytoskeletal-related protein Csp24. 22,23 Intermediate-term memory formation produced by one-trial in vitro conditioning is dependent on the expression and phosphorylation of Csp24.…”
The regulation of the intrinsic excitability of a neuron is an important aspect of cellular and synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory. Various voltage-dependent K(+) channels have been shown to be critical for the modification of membrane excitability. Components of the cytoskeleton have been proposed to contribute to the location, distribution, and function of diverse K(+) channels. However, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of the cytoskeleton by signaling pathways and the role of the cytoskeleton in the induction of intrinsic excitability is not understood. Hermissenda Csp24 is a beta-thymosin-like protein containing multiple actin-binding domains that contributes to intrinsic enhanced excitability produced by Pavlovian conditioning. One-trial in vitro conditioning produces a significant reduction in the A-type transient K(+) current (I(A)) and a depolarized shift in the steady-state activation curve of I(A). Intermediate and long-term enhanced excitability produced by one-trial conditioning is also dependent on the expression and phosphorylation of Csp24. Blocking the expression of Csp24 with an antisense oligonucleotide inhibits the development of intermediate-term enhanced excitability and the concomitant reduction in I(A) normally produced by one-trial in vitro conditioning. In this report using two-dimensional gel PAGE and electrospray mass spectrometry, we have identified two phosphorylation sites on Csp24. Using phospho-specific antibodies with Western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation procedures we show that one-trial in vitro conditioning results in an increase in the phosphorylation of Ser-122, but not Ser-49 of Csp24.
“…To understand such interacting events, it is necessary to first reduce them to their operant and classical components and then join them again under controlled conditions. Laboratory studies of classical conditioning have successfully interrupted the operant-classical feedback loop such that the behavior of the animal is irrelevant and the two environmental events (the conditioned stimulus, CS, which predicts the unconditioned stimulus, US) can be traced from their sensory afferents to the brain and, finally, to the point where they converge and the learning occurs (e.g., Walters and Byrne 1983;Bao et al 1998;Hawkins et al 1998;Kim et al 1998; Lechner et al 2000a,b;Schafe et al 2001;Medina et al 2002;Paschall and Davis 2002;Ressler et al 2002;Antonov et al 2003;Crow and Tian 2003;Davis et al 2003;Epstein et al 2003;Flynn et al 2003;Mozzachiodi et al 2003;Nader 2003). An analogous convergence point between operant behavior and the unconditioned stimulus (or reinforcer in the operant nomenclature) has recently been described in Aplysia (Nargeot et al 1999a,b;Brembs et al 2002).…”
Operant and classical conditioning are major processes shaping behavioral responses in all animals. Although the understanding of the mechanisms of classical conditioning has expanded significantly, the understanding of the mechanisms of operant conditioning is more limited. Recent developments in Aplysia are helping to narrow the gap in the level of understanding between operant and classical conditioning, and have raised the possibility of studying the neuronal processes underlying the interaction of operant and classical components in a relatively complex learning task. In the present study, we describe a first step toward realizing this goal, by developing a single in vitro preparation in which both operant and classical conditioning can be studied concurrently. The new paradigm reproduced previously published results, even under more conservative and homogenous selection criteria and tonic stimulation regime. Moreover, the observed learning was resistant to delay, shortening, and signaling of reinforcement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.