2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of individual ratings of emotional salience: a trial-related fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
239
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 372 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
35
239
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the anticipation-probe run, anticipation was substantially disrupted and lengthened by the affect probes. To avoid confounding activation due to incentive anticipation with activation due to responding to the affect probes (Phan et al, 2004), only the outcome-probe runs were included in the whole-brain and VOI results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the anticipation-probe run, anticipation was substantially disrupted and lengthened by the affect probes. To avoid confounding activation due to incentive anticipation with activation due to responding to the affect probes (Phan et al, 2004), only the outcome-probe runs were included in the whole-brain and VOI results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, investigators who used continuous online ratings in an FMRI study to probe affect during film clips reported no effect of rating on either self-reported affect or brain areas associated with the affective response to films (Hutcherson et al, 2005; although the NAcc was not one of these). The areas they and others (e.g., Phan et al, 2004;Taylor et al, 2003) have found to be associated with rating emotion (anterior cingulate, insula, and parietal cortex) were not the direct focus of this study, but further investigation of how online probes affect reward-related paradigms is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this hypothesis, there is evidence that activity in the MPFC increases linearly with increased ratings of self-relevance of stimuli. 75,77 A recent study by Moran et al 78 further suggests that the MPFC signals the personal relevance of incoming information even in the absence of explicit requirements for self-reflection (i.e., during passive viewing conditions).…”
Section: A Potential Role Of the Mpfc In Self-referential Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, these latter studies all required veridical cognitively-based appraisals of affectively laden stimuli (similar to the AVA condition of this paradigm), yet these occurred in the absence of an explicitly self-relevant context, and therefore did not evoke cortical midline structures. Phan (2004) addressed the question of potentially dissociable neural substrates underlying appraisal of emotion and personal relatedness, comparing separate ratings of these criteria to activation evoked during presentation of affective pictorial stimuli. That study identified differential but overlapping neural substrates associated with ratings along either dimension, specifically ventral MPFC activation (as well as dorsal MPFC and anterior insula) was associated with appraisal of personal relatedness, the Amg with emotional intensity, and the Nacc with both appraisal types.…”
Section: Ventral Ampfc Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%