2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of gratitude

Abstract: Gratitude is an important aspect of human sociality, and is valued by religions and moral philosophies. It has been established that gratitude leads to benefits for both mental health and interpersonal relationships. It is thus important to elucidate the neurobiological correlates of gratitude, which are only now beginning to be investigated. To this end, we conducted an experiment during which we induced gratitude in participants while they underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging. We hypothesized that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the activation may reflect recipients' genuine goodwill for the benefactor's welfare and the motivation of actively seeking reward for the benefactor. Another possibility is that this activation encodes a self-focused motivation underlying reciprocity, such as avoiding guilt and indebtedness (Fisher et al, 1982;Nadler and Fisher, 1986;Watkins et al, 2006;Manela, 2016). If this is the case, then the recipients do not reciprocate because they desire to reward the benefactor, but because they are averse to the anticipated guilt of not doing so (Fehr and Schmidt, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the activation may reflect recipients' genuine goodwill for the benefactor's welfare and the motivation of actively seeking reward for the benefactor. Another possibility is that this activation encodes a self-focused motivation underlying reciprocity, such as avoiding guilt and indebtedness (Fisher et al, 1982;Nadler and Fisher, 1986;Watkins et al, 2006;Manela, 2016). If this is the case, then the recipients do not reciprocate because they desire to reward the benefactor, but because they are averse to the anticipated guilt of not doing so (Fehr and Schmidt, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting here that no major psychological study thus far has centrally involved comparisons of gratitude's benefits in contexts of inequality or oppression, (quite reasonably) focusing instead usually on gratitude's benefits and manifestations in relatively affluent western contexts (e.g. Lambert, Graham & Fincham, 2009;Froh et al, 2014;Fox et al, 2015).…”
Section: Gratitude Gratitude Everywherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construct is related to communal relationships described by psychologists, sociologists, and anthropologists (Algoe, 2012;Algoe et al, 2008;Clark and Mills, 1993;Clark and Mills, 2012;Elfers and Hlava, 2016;McCullough et al, 2001;Nowak and Sigmund, 2005), while obligation, in contrast, corresponds more to transactional exchange relationships (Greenberg, 1980;Greenberg and Westcott, 1983;Watkins et al, 2006). Future work might design tasks that can better differentiate between gratitude and guilt to explore whether these two emotions of communal concern have shared or differential neurocognitive mechanisms (Chang et al, 2011;Fox et al, 2015;Koban et al, 2013;Krajbich et al, 2009;Yu et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%